“What is your investment in the system?”
Or indeed any commercial construct you’re part of at this time, is it emotional, physical or time-based? Is the system you’re part of right? Do you ignore injustices or have done in the past to avoid conflict or you simply feared your job and livelihood? Even if there is no direct correlation you can find with these questions, we have been indirectly involved in terrible things against others and the Earth itself. It’s drilled into us that the vicious wars across the world are for a just cause and that your sweat equity is required to build the machines to punish others into submitting to the authority of the Holy See and Crown. And that the Gulf Oil disaster is all part of the motions of corporate domination of the Earth’s resources, and that if you want to freely move around, accept the consequences on a land in which you cannot see. On an everyday level, we now accept Police battering people both verbally and physically on TV as entertainment; ignore managers of corporations regularly bullying people into submission of control; and pretend to believe that the pandemonium, called British Politics, actually has any benefit to our lives.
People will cling onto what they already have invested into these corporatised systems, but in order to fully appreciate this vision, my experience and Neil Kramer’s is that all investment in these systems needs to be suspended in order to see it for what it really is. This is indeed where we begin to see the cracks and your Serf classing changes overnight. Maybe to counteract this increasing shift in consciousness, the System is making it harder for people to sit around on benefits by getting them out to 9-5 slavery, as it’s these kinds of people who quickly become disenfranchised with the system, if not already. By studying advertising and government research, it is not hard to see correlations of ‘competency’ and ‘intelligence’ between the ‘Underclasses’ and the Upperclasses. The only difference is that one learns from life and the other learns in grand institutions – this is the magic of humanity in action and gives a vivid illustration that no matter your authority, you’re still no better than anyone else.
“Whether you’re a Teacher, Marxist, Politician, Cleaner, whatever, we all need to think how we can suspend what we’re doing to catch up with the reality from looking at the bigger picture. Everyone is guessing, even the people moving the chess pieces, its mad to think we’re all guessing.”
Retrospectively, Neil Kramer conjures up a definitive picture that most of the things we’re taught in schools and teach our kids now is total rubbish and it’s part of the ‘old way’. For instance, science is a religion because it’s based on a belief system and it’s this belief system, which is being fused with the corporate socialist ideology to create the future ‘State’ we’re in today. John Harris asked me the other day, ‘where does electricity come from?’ Good question, I have no idea past the notion that it’s produced in giant complexes and pushed down wire to us. Without swallowing a whole load of scientific jargon for years on end, I would have no clue of their belief on this question. They talk about how a Photon (basis of the physical world we see) can only be observed and cannot be predicted, and that light is both a wave and particle – what was there is no more and what could be can happen, all in less than a millisecond. Science has gone from a factually based belief system to skewing itself more and more into metaphysics. Simply, we rely on guessing, our whole civilisation is based on a bunch of people all running around not really knowing what they’re doing – this can now be proven with science… HA! Does the universe allow us to observe the minuet details of part of itself in an attempt to help us realise something?
You get what you’re given…
Where does the metaphysical belief within science leave control mechanisms? Does this answer the fact that when we try to control, things start to move out of phase from the plan? We literally cannot plan anything because as soon as it’s observed, it changes because we never get what we imagined – we get a reflection. The reflection is produced by our intent, investment and programmed lives – this is why there is an attempt made to regulate every part of our lives with policy and insane fictional law. So that when we make the decision to do something, it will be within the realms of policy, so the system can keep control by predicting the most likely outcome – this is inhumane.
Neil Kramer talks in this podcast and in his new work about his antidote, the ‘Disavowal of the Shadow’:
“When we perceive our own inauthentic actions and continue to do nothing about them. This is exasperated by surrender to the dominion of the ego, me-centric thinking and self-absorbed pleasure hunting or escape. This principle is vital to the conscious evolutionary shift that is required to overturn the old hierarchy.
The core teaching is simple: we are the shadow. Each and every polarised negative entity that manifests in this world is our responsibility, our creation. The immutable flow from mind to matter, from consciousness to creation, does not allow us to disregard a given challenge. We cannot just let things go unresolved, try as we might. Negative energy patterns – destructive impulses concealed in dysfunction, fear and pain – cannot simply be abandoned. They must be faced and understood in order for their patterning to dissolve.”
Lawful Rebellion for me is as I’ve said before is only where it starts. It is just another way to realise that we create everything around us, and there is no other way for complete domination of us all without utter compliance from our minds, bodies and souls. There has been a steady increase through my life of a distortion between my mind, body and soul. This is partly achieved by creating the tick-a-box society whereby people subscribe to corporate hierarchy shrouded as ‘marketing tribes’, which is slowly replacing the class system. There is not one god anymore, there are 100s of demigods, and our minds and souls are being confused with our egos in fake portrayals of human behaviour. But the thing that physically keeps us controlled is the use of our bodies through 9-5 slavery, and the constant reiteration that our bodies are walking-talking fictional pieces of paper, which is the basis of our Serfdom and torture on this Earth.
A way to make a change…
Both Neil and I along with many others talk about how to be creative, stop what you’re doing and consider your actions. Your journey to lawfulrebellion.org and TPUC.org is a result of you beginning your journey of realisation because you sense something isn’t quite right. Everything is you and you are everything. Try something out, the next time you question something in your daily life maybe at work or on the move, do something about it, this action could completely change the direction not just of your life, but of others, especially if you make the right choice guided by your heart, no matter what the cost is to your physical world. I can promise you from my experience and Neil Kramer’s, the universe around you will reward you in some way. But you need to be open to feel the experience, as it can quickly be shattered by the ego within you, it’s happened to me many times – it is a learning curve and it gets better with time, so be patient. There are nasty people out there who we have created through not dealing with our fears that need our emotions to make things happen, which throw us collectively into more isolation from humanity. In order for our fears to stay real, we need to abide by the policy and laws of the System in order to safeguard the foundation of our construct. Why? We all have some real investment in disguising our fears and shifting blame onto scapegoats such as the Government and BP. This is quintessentially where 
Lawful Rebellion can become a stepping-stone or just another investment into the System. As if you continue to send out negativity through pieces of paper; avoid the system’s policy; borrow knowledge without full comprehension; and scapegoat the system you’re part of, you will only get back a reflection of your fears and you end up back where you started.
The question was asked to Neil in the podcast, how can people who have investment in the System and other commercial constructs stop what they’re doing without their families going hungry and them loosing their way of life? As this is the thing which people always resort to as an excuse or the ultimate argument to disembowel real change. Here it is, based on the podcast with Neil Kramer, his past articles and some ideas from Deep Ecology and lawfulrebellion.org:
- Neil says, ‘There is a distinct difference between I would like to stop doing this and I’m stopping what I’m doing.’ Please contemplate this, as you will feel what investments you have within the system and begin to sense the control mechanisms deep in your everyday life – this will either make you more fearful or make you stop after an individual process of realisation.
- ‘Zoom out’, go away for a weekend with a notepad and pen and write down everything you think you need to do to sustain your existence and maybe your families if you have one. Do this with your partner if you feel it’s required. Look at the list and make up two piles, one ‘required’ one ‘consumption’ putting each ‘need’ into one or the other. To help you work this list out, maybe look at evidence of people who don’t use money for things in your list or use alternatives. We have a great podcast with Deep Ecology that goes into how people live outside of a corportised world. Do your own research.
- Once you’ve worked out what you need to live, whether it’s an amount of money for a long space of free time or ways in which you can share your skills to provide an existence. ‘You will begin to see it’s not as bad as you previously thought because your intent is real and resonates with your heart.’ Individual events will unfold that will help you on your way and you need to try and not stick to anything written down, see how things can work another way. You will begin to make new friends and feel their energy, which will help guide you on your way. This is not something that happens overnight or even in one month, you need least two months realisation and then the journey mentioned in this pointer can take a few years. I myself am only halfway through the process and I’ve been at this for around 2 years now. So be patient and stick to it if you want this, you can have it. If you fail, you will go back to the System at least with a new perspective on things and hopefully will try again or help others do the same, then come back and do it again yourself. There is no rush, you have all your life ahead of you. Becoming a Sovereign human is both an insane (from a corporate perspective) and a beautiful universal opportunity to do what you feel is right for yourself. I now see so many unique people and how others help me on my way with gifts and charity in return for my goodwill. This is something that can never be achieved in a corporate and hierarchal order.
Please enjoy the podcast! Any questions, leave them on the comments, I will answer.
David Ophalus
Here’s some links:
Neil’s shop: http://cleavermedia.blogspot.com/
Neil’s site: http://thecleaver.blogspot.com/
Neil’s Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/cleavervideos#p/c/7BBA26DB24916978
C-Realm: http://c-realmpodcast.podomatic.com/
Diet Soap: http://dietsoap.podomatic.com/
I am a Gaian,
This I hold to be self evident …
What we are experiencing at this cycle is merely the group mind, society, growing up as a whole , so from childhood through current adolescence to a future adulthood.
This is an entirely natural process that occurs from population density and the information and cultural reflection of the internet phenomenon. Technology is our system for reflecting our selves en mass much as the ego reflects our mind back to us. All is vanity, and all is smoke and mirrors. See outside the box 🙂
As is quite rightly pointed out in the above article, we ourselves through the power of thought and manifesting are entirely responsible for the shape and construct of the system we see and experience.
The more negative energy we transmit through ‘Notices’, ‘Liens’, ‘Letters’ and phone calls that are done with a degree of anger and expected revenge will only bring about the same effect and compound what is already happening.
The ‘system’ thrives on ‘Ego’and controvesary and will attempt to divide and conquer wherever it is able to. We all know the ‘Ego’ (some call it Satan) within us is a very powerful force to deal with.
If it can be believed that what we have manifested without can be changed from within then it is to ourselves, thoughts and actions we should be looking at. I am not religious but it seems many of the answers are provided in the New Testament. ”Love thine enemy as Thyself”.
There appears to be a distinct lack of Love and we can create an impenetrable fortress of Love from within and see the changes occur without.
I see the word ‘Slavery’ used but I am not convinced we have been enforced into this slavery. I am more inclined to believe that we have placed ourselves into ‘Voluntary Servitude’. I say this because the more I research the subject the more it stands out for me that everything really is Freewill. It seems to me that we are certainly free to make choices and it is only our own ignorance of those choices that we volunteer ourselves as ‘Citizens’ with the associated rights, entitlements and benefits which of course can be removed or manipulated.
How did we make the freewill choice of being a ‘Citizen’? Well, firstly we followed the sheep of course and believed it was the right thing to do but essentially what we did is we took ownership of the ‘Name’. By that I mean the ‘Name’ that appears on your Birth Certificate (BC).
For those that have researched the BC they may have the same conclusions as me. That is that the BC is primarily a certification of a live birth when it is registered. You will notice if you look at some BC’s it asks for ‘Name’ (if any)’ and there is a facility within the registration process to add the name after the registration. Therefore it is the birth that is certified and registered, not the ‘Name’. This is most interesting as many people I speak to are of the opinion that it is the ‘Name’ that is registered.
The ‘Name’ of course is normally provided at the time of registration but of course doesn’t have to be.
The BC in my opinion is a type of receipt (wharehouse receipt if you like). Who owns the BC? Well, you only have to look at one to see it watermarked and stamped all over that it is Crown property. Another very important aspect of the BC is of course something very revealing written upon it in bold and capital letters as follows ”WARNING: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY”(it is not your name)
Now things get very interesting. ‘Know Thyself’. The ‘Ego’ likes to think that you own and are the ‘Name’ written upon the BC. However, who owns the BC? You see, we know the ‘Crown’ owns the BC, there can be no denying that. So, it follows that anything written upon the BC (their property) is also theirs. If a ‘Name’ appears on their BC for example ‘Joe Alfred BLOGGS’ then the ‘Name’ is owned by the Crown and IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY (Personal Identification).
The BC also has plainly written/typed upon it ‘CROWN COPYRIGHT’.
Now, please, tell me how we become the ‘Name’? Think about it. Why do you think you are the ‘Name’?
Look again at the Bible and the beginning where Eve was made for Adam. It says ”Adam named her name Eve” (not that he named her Eve, he named her name Eve). That again is very telling. It completely seperates the ‘Name’ from the Man/Woman.
We know from history as pointed out, that the Pope ‘Owns’ all and is directly connected to the Crown.
If the ‘Crown’ own the ‘Name’, do they own the ‘Person’? Yes, of course they do however the ‘Person’ is not a Man/Woman. It is a legal fiction entity that is given to a Man/Woman to enable commerce. Given to ‘Use’in commerce.
If you own something then is it fair to say that you also have the liability of whatever you own? I think it is. You see, you do not own the ‘Name’ or have liability for it, the owner does.
Now remember, the UK Corporation is believed to be bankrupt and in 1933ish it is believed that the Corporation placed everythng into Trust to protect it from the Creditors. If we believe we are operating in Bankruptcy (which I do) then of course we cannot possible own anything anyway. The use of ‘Fiat Currency’ ‘Promises’ is also a huge tell tale sign of the UK and all other IMF members being Bankrupt.
Know Thyself – So think about this. The ‘Name’ you ‘use’ is that of a ‘Person’ that is used in commerce. The BC is effectively a certificate of Incorporation (proof of a company/trust)and each ‘Person’ is a seperate company which is able to earn for its ‘owners’ (The Crown). Everything is pre-paid anyway from the Bankruptcy but we have to accept that we do not own the ‘Name’. If you insist on owning the ‘Name’ then of course you will be tresspassing upon the property of the Crown and causing controvesy for the courts (and they love that). As the newly stated ‘owner’you also become liable for the ‘Name’. You volunteered your surety.
The ‘Ego’ drives us to own everything we can and build our rich empire. What we have to realise is that we actually own nothng whatsoever, not even the shirt on your back. It’s a hard concept to accept but the more you look at it the more true it becomes. Of course the positive side to this is that you have no Fiduciary responsibility for the ‘Name’ if you handle this correctly and don’t introduce controvesy.
You see, in my opinion you have always been as free as you want to be and when the penny drops and realise that you really only have the liability for the ‘Name’ if you volunteer it then your whole world will change.
By the way, this has nothing to do with denying you are the ‘Person’as that is controvesy, and they love controvsey.
You volunteered for the role of ‘Citizen’ whether you like it or not. There are other choices to make. Be at peace, don’t tresspass on the name, don’t cause controvesy, don’t argue and dishonour or make claims against your brothers and sisters, treat your enemy with love and compassion, forgive without being asked for forgiveness, treat your opponent as a stronger opponent (wash their feet), control the Ego, change from within and I believe we will change the without. Love is the impenetrable fortress.
You have a ‘Name’ to use without liability, the BC is like a company credit card if you like, you just haven’t let yourself see that yet and also learnt how to ‘use’ it in peace. How to be a peaceful inhabitant (not a resident of the UK), and how to stop wanting to ‘own’ anything.
Know Thyself, Be Thyself.
A journey I am currently embracing.
Great podcast.
Thanks Neil and David.
thats ok steven – the pleasure was ours!
excellent stuff
greetings from canada – i am truly honoured and blessed to have listened to this dialogue…sincerely, bette
we feel blessed that it made a difference to your life! we’re not alone…
Spot on Terry,
In the words of Bob Dylan “if you aint got nothing, you got nothing to loose”.
We are here on this planet to use what we want, not own it.
No ownership, no liability, including most importantly the name.
The government are obviously starting to be afraid in the US and have started to feed lies to the public regarding Freeman Movement, Check this link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vADxWj-LPM8&feature=player_embedded
great podcast. like you say its nice to see people waking up in their own time.the resonance is definately growing in strength.
blessed be beautiful people.
thanks tom! have fun!
Beloved Lawful Rebellion, wonderful stuff as ever, you have taken me through thick and thin. The Love is Here!
For some really great info on HOW TO HEAL OUR WORLD and the ‘nature of reality’ Please check this interview here:
http://probablefuture.com/Reality_Secrets_Unveiled.htm
The time to look Within has never been better! Love to you all!
David this is great (and still improving) work. Thank you. Could I trouble you for the name of the track at the end of the podcast please?
that track is one of mine greg. if you want a copy, email the site and i will send you one. cheers
THE SCIENCE OF LIFE AND CONTINUED EXISTENCE :
Progress is the very idea of culture conceived as a revolutionary force.
Culture would have hindered our progress if we had a grievance against nature,
Which is a gift of God…
Fannon.
The monuments in Afrika were set up as remembrance of the teachings of the ancestors throughout the ages, (now destroyed by Babylon and the Arabs, and taken away to the four quarters of the earth, including the gold artefacts – and even the mummies, and the very so-called idols in gold to be adored or worshipped, as did they now ascribe to, those same so-called idols which they condemned Afrikans for worshipping, but which they ever did themselves through ignorance, (2 Kings 23, Hosea 2).
In Afirka the supposed idols were totemic types of the mother as the names of the individuals in the clans and the name-places of the habitats or dwelling-places, (Genesis 36:40-43) which depicts origin, descent and identity of the social groups, or clans, as the coat-of-arms/
They were also employed as the signs of the phonetic word-sounds in verbal speech repeated in the oral traditions, and were later carved into wood or on stones in the picture-writings which were used to record the events of sacred and feast days in the cycles of time of our forefathers, and their cultural development, in the absent of photography, and were continued in the written literature of the funerary rites of the King as the phonograms which supplement the hieroglyphs or the later alphabetic letters of the written texts as the verbs and nouns, which preserved the thoughts of our forefathers, (which they now tell us (Christian and Muslims alike) to leave behind because they are idols so as to pre-occupy us, psychologically, with their god and mammon which are its benefits established through robbery with violence and pre-meditated murder, even their one another, and for us to serve their own agenda, of material accumulation and money with our own resources with our labour) later perverted in the bible as a promised racial inheritance by the Jewish, and the Gentiles followed suite, of property in the ownership of land and even other peoples, (See the system of usury introduced into Egypt by Joseph, Genesis and the church indolent in the slave trade through owner of share in neo-colonial and present investments in South Afrika and other places, (Genesis 47-49, cf., Exodus 21, Joshua 18,…???? Numbers 31 Isaiah 61).
This social culture as the subject matter recorded in the bible can be described as either racial or class, or the Jews and the Gentile syndrome subsequently established in Europe as a social tool used to demarcate people in society with all its consequents of abuse and exploitation
For example, Theodore Boszak Says of this European perception asserted by Francis Bacon, Rene Descrates and others from a Platonic conceptual thinking: “They (the Europeans) had found the great truth break faith with environment establish between yourself, and it, the alternative dichotomy called objectivity, and you will surely gain power. Then nothing – no sense of fellowship or personal intimacy or strong belonging – will bar your success to the delicate mysteries of man and nature. Nothing will inhibit your ability to manipulate and exploit. This is the same power we gain over people when we refuse to honour their claim to respect, to compassion, to love.”
They become for us mere things on which to exercise power. Between them there is no commerce of feelings (of brotherhood). No exchange of sentiment or empathy.” (My italics)
Culturally, mode of speech behaviour or expression intellectually or academically, or ways of conduct (socially morally) does not necessarily determine intelligence. Europeans of course in relation to own perception of their own cultural mores and expression have more access to their own educational facilities and institutions for cultivating that expression and perception which they adheres to. Which from an Anti-integrationist or Anti- assimilations perspective is denied blacks in a society which purports to be a Multi-Racial one?
Moreover, the perception of the black mentality or psyche base as it is, upon a bio-socio-cultural and religious concept of kinship ties and relationship, creates a different perception and practise socio-morally of what human relation should be (spiritual cohesiveness) rather than from a Caucasian grab-and-flee perspective, their social structure and economic base relationship with its class stratification or material exploitation and division.
With this perception in mind (in relation to achievement or success economic or otherwise) one (in particular black people) should compare “Japanese social structure” which is based upon family and kinship relationships, or, like for example, the Chinese “one thousand
Families” which in root is of an Afrian origin… in contrast to Europeans.
The damaged cause to the human psychic, by the vexation of the socio-spirit i.e. the inner-self, within the heart (not the mind mentally) from a social perception in relation to human spirituality and social relationships in Western societies, helps in tipping the balance in favour of phobias, extreme neuroses, and psychoses. Nevertheless the mode of European intellectual academy now and before… is still the basis of social control, not for socio-human benefit, but for power-domination and money.
European public relation to act like friend towards those they regard as enemies is cited by Juseph Arthur Gobinean: when he says that strict despotism is the only way of governing the Negro, (selected political writing Haper & Row 1970)
Mental illness or its causes in Africa is seen as the possession of a person by a spirit,” (inimical or the opposite … like white racism) which causes anti-social behaviour (or abnormality within the social norm) as an expressed conditions of one’s psychic consciousness from a spiritual perspective, or in relation to some form of vexation of the spirit-soul from social anxieties or trauma, i.e., social-standing, family i.e., marital or otherwise. The effects of these social phenomena is sometimes called Obeah in Afrika, in
The West Indies or among Afro-Caribbean, North and South American
Communities seen as the spreading of bad social vibes, i.e., family contention etc. economic, social, sexual or otherwise, through personal greed or individual selfishness and is treated in that context, (See English Joinery men)
The Church (institutionalized religion) first, then psychiatry, became the means by which the State then coerced individuals (without any means deprived from them by the very State) into shouldering their own burden and to take responsibility for their own actions or ostracizing descanting groups or individuals. Like the inquisition by Pope Gregory 1X. 1231 to Pope Paul 111 1542, etc. used to forged the solidarity of the European ideology of universal (class…rich poor) imperialism through the renaissance in the modern period by the incorporation of physical and social science ideology and its various discipline (including the socio-moral) through which it was promoted and which superseded the church occupying power of control which criminalise a people outside their own culture.
From their perspective as cultural practise the Judaic religious literature which influence European political ideologies, their jurisprudences in common and secular laws, and social moral practise of race, property and money introduced a system of slavery which became institutionalised in Europe as a cultural practise, from the fields to the factories (See “The Condition of the Working Class Population in the 18th Century, (by Feuerbach) the thesis from Marx and Engel’s wrote their dialectical materialism and hence Communism, (See Exodus 21, Leviticus 25, Deuteronomy 15:12-18, Isaiah 61:55-7), but religious ideology illustrates, when observed in democratic political practise, the perversion as is demonstrated by their of their moral integrity which is supposed to be righteous and upright…???? and superiority (pulmugated through the church) through occupation, robbery with violence and pre-meditated murder, expressed as a political ideology called religion (when the Germans in Namibia, the Dutch in South Afrika, the English Europeans in Australia, New Zealand or America (north and south) believed and effect a designs in the form of social engineering to establish their beliefs as a social practise through the Jewish religious literature which was geared to accumulate resources of other peoples food, clothe and shelter for sale on the stock market (as was the Afrikan person upon the stock) in Europe In the capitalist system of the free market, founded upon slavery stabilised through the biblical writings as a Judeo-Christian social institution, along with usury (Genesis 47:13-26, Exodus 21, (Isaiah 61:5-7) Leviticus 25, who hate oppression for Israel, but love injustice for others, Isaiah 61:8), derived from a Jewish social culture ; which was founded upon a culture, of robbery with violence and premeditated murder called conquest and empire ; but which was serfdom in Europe, and called slavery only when applied to Afrikans, so has to racially marginalise and ostracise and kill black people, among whom they themselves were forced to seek refuge from their European Kings, Lords and nobles and the emerging middle class, through the creation of a system of wage labourer, from the field and/or the plantation to the factory, and through criminalisation for being lazy or a non-worker, and imprisionment and/or exportation of them to foreign lands, where their heirs, now still has the best land that was gained by fraud and deciet and/or through force of arms, for agriculture (see also the social phenomena of Europe at the time) and now manage the rest of the land for the purpose of economic growth in their own countries in Europe, and tourism for their own self benefit, and who now presently live in a paradise of luxury, among the dead and dying in Afirkan, Asia and other places, to effect wealth and maintain perpetual economic growth in the mother country (the original goal which had inspired the invasion under the auspices of the Catholic and Anglican church of England (See the pope of Rome Constantine, and William invasion of England, what they believe then, about Afrikans and people of Afrikan descent, that they still practise today, and teach to their children from one generation to the next, (See Steven Lawrance and Anthony Walker).
Form our cultural orientation, our religion then, is our culture, and our way of life, our identity, as racial expression of truth, not false assumptions of hope through faith, from egalitarian visionary and social compassion, of patience in faith…..????/ from the social disintegration induced upon I an I by another, through force affiliation to others, such as Judeo-Christianity of Judeo-Islam has not assimilated us within either culture, after 600 years, and at least from 4-300 AD in Nubia/Egypt were Judeo-Christians or Judeo-Islam is concern.
And we done know from ours, and the experience of our forefathers, that adherence to a religious faith in comradeship with other followers (has they had done, and our parents had follow suite, has they had persistently persevered to do) has guarantee them (and by extension their children) no unity in love and brotherhood.
It is the spirit of Jah that guide and protects the I, through his meditation of the heart in a positive mental (vibes) perceptions of the mind which is manifested in the I own doings executed in accordance with the character and the personality of H.I.M – in uprightness equality and justice, continually. So put your trust in what you see and observe (know), and in your Idrin (by forming a bond or covenant of belief in an Oath of brotherhood; and keep it, and let Rastafari be your guide.
This is I an I covenant direct from the creative speech of the god visible demonstrated or illustrated in nature and its processes of continued existence…….
Because it is through the bonding of the brotherhood and sisterhood in the natural jungle of the human world, (not in the artificial world of the free market created, by genetic engineering instigated by politicians (church and the state), Mosque nor Synagogues, as so-called democrat and free), that Jah doeth work wonders – through true vibes and natural laws, in a simple arrangement as a festivity, or a commemoration of life seasonally and social structures in a dialogue of understanding in which the livity will be manifested accordingly with that upfulness of togetherness. It is in this bonding only that Jah directs thy heart in thy going in and thy coming out…..
********************************
In Afrikan religious practise a prayer is a Ritual act, i.e., doing the word as signs, and orchestrated by the heart and tongue, words and action, (Exodus 24.4, Mark 16.20, Joshua 24. 6, Luke 4.32, 36. Matthew 12. Proverbs 8:5
“These are the word that I covenant with you when you came up out of Egypt, so my spirit remaineth among you: fear you not,” (the wicked), Haggai 2:5.
But the real inequality in this virtual world guided by the modern democratic secular moral values, artificially devised by the market forces which directs and dictates, and determines our lives, (even the present economic crisis), as the operative organ of the social system, but also by virtue of our assumed faith in Jesus Christ which is a contradiction in terms, and your affiliation to a race. Here in this virtual world, you can go to a priest, or otherwise, and confess your sins, and through him, asked god for forgiveness, and by just talking about you transgressions and sins, unloading your burden, and putting them behind you, in the past, you can be rejuvenated to go forward (especially in baptism by water,) as if you had done nothing wrong through, Jesus Christ in the flesh, here and now…
But if this was so, how many times would you be allowed to sin, and murder even strangers who have never offended or done nothing to you, thief, and tell lies, to your family and friends and strangers and confess them in the tribunal of truth?
Although moral values were those same ones that were identified as being based upon the truth and right, (Mat) in accordance with the covenant and law of the god, and were applied to a different social evaluation based upon the persons deeds and acts in their lives, and this subject matter was pre-extant in pre-historic writings from pre-historic times, which were said to be associated with the judgment of the spirit-soul in the double Halls Maati in the Afrikan-Egyptian texts chapter 125-126, expressed in the testimonies in which the soul of the deceased says he has he has not done that which is an abomination (i.e., falsehood, cf., John 10:34, and Ritual chapters 47, and 50 A &B) because he had “done the truth and right of the lord of truth and right” which set the balance of scales straight, Ritual chapters 14, 99, 125, 126, 136B, cf., Exodus chapters 20-23, Leviticus chapters 16, 25, and 29, compare Revelation chapters 21 and 22……..
In traditional beliefs (i.e., our Afrikan cultural orientation) the ultimate cause “the first cause” stems from our spiritual conception (of the heart) of “the soul” or “being,” relative to human relationship in group identity and social bonding in particular the family, because human relation is based upon the assumption of the need to cultivate social interactions based upon love and understanding.
The only permanent treatment to any alternative social symptoms of self or the individual is group therapy in social bonding, or in kinship relation because in Afrika, and even when it is highly personal, treatment was not individualistic because it rested upon an imperative morality, which was expressed collectively, personal responsibility and individual choice was never a trait of human consciousness and/or being.
Thus in Afrika the suffering these through of the symptoms might have been solitary but the treatment was social and had the capacity and the perception to externalise, publicly accept, and to treat anxieties by open ritual which carried with its a certain power that was therapeutic in its relief in Afrikan social structures were the group (community/society) took over. The individual was not left to suffer in isolation. The burden of adjustment was not allowed to fall upon the individual.
Each moral or social (or individual) acts and its consequence are expressed proverbially in Afrika, and this one is no exception.
It is said, “When there are adults in the those, the child should not be left to suffer on its tether
Afrikan customs, social practice and religious perceptions are media’s which gives tangible substance to moral obligations brotherhood as permanent and enduring which is reflected in a convictions and a way of life in which human relationships must be adhered to as man sees it in common which is further manifested in a chain of equilibrated relationship in trust through material sustenance for the group:
1)
Good and services provided by the group in which the individuals with the support of all eventually becomes resourceful giving back (alms, tithe) to the community hence gaining consciousness which engenders political influence,
2)
Marriage – the extended family incorporation into a broader group in cohesiveness
3)
Cultural education on the social necessities of community and their distribution which cultivates a social order and a spiritual being of awareness, corporation and solidarity.
4)
trust and confidence in the knowing of one’s self and the caring for the welfare of others guaranteed by the group as a belief-practice of the Afrikan model which strengthens the individual, (like the English motto of country first) and not individuals with individual rights divorced from the social whole. The former proves like in the natural environment, that there is a moral order. It is these Afrikan social and moral obligations that are the basis of the religious perceptions of so-called modern religions.
The alternative likes the Judeo-Christian practise is covetousness, deceit, distrust (in particular of politicians), lying, stealing and eventually the violent disintegration of the society.
In the drama of human life, depicted by the plays in “Afrikan” theatre or pantomime – like in the animal world, and human inter-relationships (called social psychology in Europe) in establishing social harmonies or preventing social conflicts, or identifying or bonding and resolving social or family problems, in the reconciling of dichotomies within a given natural order… healing..
These also combine spiritual powers (i.e., the “being” of the soul) with specialized knowledge (medicinal properties or healing, and magical (i.e., medicine from herbs, plants, insects, reptiles and animals) protection) two conditions of the later medieval churches of Europe including that of superhuman (called super natural) matters concerning the general life of the community as in group therapy.
Traditional methods of psychotherapy and treatment of anxiety in Afrika had long anticipated Freud. Local customs and the complex unities of traditional thought which lay in the roots of causality, was mandatory, as well as explanatory, religious or secular.
It was through ritual training, and through the approprtate ritual and its assoiated techniques of self-entrancement and divination – of speaking for the spirits – that the authority of ancestral charters was expressed, and these may be regarded as religious, magcical, scientific, medical, cultural social or political, and it was in truth all six in one, from one state, or stage of being to another in its mode of executuion or administration which were dispensed to ensue success rather than disaster.
Seen historically, these systems and their rituals of catharsis may wear an ambivalent face. They were means of reconciling conflicts within a given natural order which were mandatory as well as explanatory. They were also a means of preventing systematic change in that order which is the ultimate healing process. At the same time they were flexible enough to absorb reorganisation and sharp breakdown by allowing for social changes and transition which are addressed, by animating the weakest elements of neurotic maladjustment in which the psychology of neurotic depression and its treatment must follow in the path of ones social morality and its prohibitions or imperatives which deals with ultimate causes, (not of the fittest of the zootyes adopted by humans, out-doing the other, through robbery with violence and premeditated murder, and the inmposing of slavery by force of arms, (first imposed by the sword then guns) but a balance equilibrium) and how the analyst of such disturbance construct or confirm the structural picture of the symtoms, the adversary (Satanic) evil and/or the good that is rooted in the hearts of, or is allowed to rules men lives.
Bi-polarity and it’s complementarily: Horus versus Seth.
Horus and Seth pectoral
Dashur – XIIth Dynasty – ca. 1938 – 1759 BCE.
Sources : Pyramid Texts, ca. 2348 to 2205 BCE, Shabaka Stone, ca. 710 BCE, Corpus Hermeticum, ca. 100 BCE – 270 CE, Strobaei Hermetica, ca. 500 CE.
As shown above by the Sut-Horus divinities, all manifested things have two sides, with manifold degrees between two extremes. This manifested in the personality of the King which constitute spirit, Horus, the son of the god in spirit.
Growth and stagnation, or corruption, good and evil, light and darkness, Sun and Moon are fundament for the order of creation. This principle dominates all possible areas of Afrikan-Egyptian thought. Politically (Upper versus Lower Egypt), spiritually (desert versus fertile land), physically (a “good” versus a sluggish or plundering Nile), ethically (“isefet” versus “maat”), metaphysically (deities in the phenomenal world versus Pharaoh on Earth), theologically (Horus versus Seth) and funerary (“feather of Maat” versus “heart”, heavenly versus terrestrial Nile).
Here duality and its transcendence play an essential role.
Even before creation, at the first occurrence, when Atum self-creates, his unity is only fugal, for as soon as the creator-god hatches out of his egg, he is split in two deities (see Yurugu and Ogu or Pemba and Faro, (Mande/Dogon): Shu and Tefnut. Also in Memphis duality was revered; Ptah created all by simultaneous thinking (heart, thought/mind) and speaking (tongue, speech) and acts, and not (as the Greeks would have it) by thinking first and then acting (contemplation before action).
Of all dualities, the polarity between Horus and Seth was the most thematized, for it involved the founding of the universe and the Pharaonic State itself. Pharaoh as the “Lord of the Two Lands” the earth of time and the earth of eternity (the bigger picture, not the geography), incorporates both, and this kept the two lands (the physical and the spiritual) in order and physically represented its unity. In his royal tutelary, his most important throne name was always preceded by “King of the Dual Kingdom”. Probably this duality also represented the spiritual (or political) realities of the Pre-dynastic or pre-totemic Period, (i.e., the matriarch associated with Sut as the eldest son) with two major chieftains confronting each other (the “followers of Seth” in the South and the “followers of Horus” in the North, (See Horus from Kheb).
This polarity was not static. Between Horus and Seth various stages may be discerned. The original, unending conflict (with various evils done to both) is stopped by giving each its domain, expressed as the waxing and waning of the moon in the circle of 28 division of time, but with no avail to permanence. The battle recommences until the goddess Geb, thoth or or Neith decides in favour of Horus, and Seth is punished (he has to carry Osiris and every night he reverses what Apophis, the gigantic snake of chaos, tries to do to Re, namely to stop his course by drinking up the Nile, (See the drama or mystery-play on the Shabaka Stone), see Ritual chapters 32, 39.
For example it is said by the speaker in the Ritual text, “I am yesterday of the four quarters of the world and of those seven Uraei (powers or souls) which came into existence in Amenta… (The funeral valley, cf., chapter 127B). That is to say Horus who emitted light from his own body. I am the god who fought against Suti (i.e., Satan the darkness), I have come by day, and I have risen in the footstep of the gods (Genesis 3:22-24). I am the god Khensu who driveth back all that opposes him, (Ritual chapter 83).
THE CHAPTER OF GIVING AIR TO THE OVERSEER OF THEHOUSE OF THE OVERSEER OF THE SEAL, NU, TRIUMPHANT, IN HE UNDERWORLD. He saith:-
“Hail, thou god Temu, grant thou unto me the breeze which dwelleth in thy nostrils ! I am the egg which is in Kenkenur (i.e., the Great Crackler), and I watch and guard that mighty thing which hath come into being and with which the god Seb hath open the earth. I live and it liveth; I become old, I live, and I snuff air. I am the god Utcha-aabet (i.e., the god who trieth hostility), and I revolve behind to protect the egg. I shine at the moment of Horus, the mighty god Suti, whose strength is two-fold (or the two-field god). Hail, thou who maketh sweet the seasons of the two earths (the spring and autumn or two equinoxes), thou dweller among celestial food, thou dweller in the cerulean heights of heaven, keep watch over the bebe that dwelleth in his cot (or manger), when he cometh forth to you,” Ritual ch. 54, 36, 180 Line 35.
In fact, in the Pyramid Texts, we find traces of the cult of Seth, deemed to assist, together with Horus, Pharaoh in the afterlife. Pharaoh who himself is the unity of both, as well as the “power of powers” (cf. Cannibal Hymn ) transcending both. In the Late Period, Horus and Seth form one deity, further proof of both the bi-polarity as the step beyond it.
Finally, as the soul of Osiris Horus comes forth from the Abyss of the dark or tomb to snuff the air or the sweet breath of the god Temu or Atum.
The god Uteha-aahet (the god who trieth hostility) Horus, the mighty god Suti whose strangth is two-fold, or the two opposite powers which constitue he one being as twins, or father and son Ritual ch. 54.
The Janus headed hawk, Horus, and Set, the twin brothers; the former was god of the day, and the latter god of the night,
Bushong Janus-head (the Sut-Horus; Jesus-Satan, the warring twins, or the Ka which wars with is other self, the genius or guide witihin or the opposite in the human personality which is personified by Amen-hetep iii) PRINT
INSERT chapter 4, 17 Lines 110-112, 134-136, chs. 75, 83, 110, 123, 153A Line 35,180 Lines 34-38, 181 Line 10-16, 183 Lines 8-13, 18-26, 183 Lines 9-12
These type are the two halves of a soul that was perfected in oneness, when Horus the child was blended with Horus the adult in the Ritual text called the marriage-mystery of Tattu, (See revelation 19 …????? 17 Lines 110-112 ).
Sut and Horus were the representatives of the alternating and opposing principles personified as a pair of twins, (Ritual chapters 54, 75, 80, 110 Lines 4-8, 183 Lines 9-11). Thye were now called the children of Osiris. Osiris Un-nefer is the Good Being, but as with nature he includes both the good and the evil in its totality. In the oral traditions, Horus represents the good and Sut the bad. Sut is said to undo the good that Horus does. The one in the ascendency and the other in the descendency, Ritual chapters 17 Lines 128-131, 75, 80, 110, 184 Lines 10-12.
Hence he is the adversary (of the human soul) when personified as satan. As Prince of the darkness he puts out the eye of Horus, or the light by the element, or the condition of night, (Ritual chapter 112). He sows the tares amidst the grain. He is the “eater of the arm.” He dries up the water of life with the drought of the desert. He lets loose the thunder, lightening and locusts, the scorpions and other plagues, (Ritual chapters 95, <<…????? Cf., Exodus Exodus 9:18, 23-24, 10:13 , Revelation 4, 5, and 9 . He represents negation malignant iminical forces of non-being in opposition to being, and to the Good Being who is divinized in Osiris and manifested by Horus as the life-forces of continued existence.
The triumph of Horus over Sut is the subject matter the funerary rites of the King in the Ritual.
But in the Afrikan social construct even these two forces, which alone can define a law of the fittest are, in the processes of transformation, which are the basis of renewal and change, are, and do reconcile as the causative factors of creation and/or existence and continuity as is expressed in the following chapters and their accompanying vignettes or signs…
“Come ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world” (Matt. XXV. 34).
In the Gospel according to Matthew the last judgment is to take place at the veritable ending of the world (Matt. XXV. 31-46). “When the Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all the angels with him, then shall he sit on the throne of his glory, and before him shall be gathered all the nations, and he shall separate them, as the shepherd parteth the sheep from the goats; and he shall set the sheep on the right hand, but the goats on the left.
In Egypt Sut was the eldest of the Two Brothers Sut-Horus who was often conjoined together as one male divinity. In the Afrikan matrilineal sociology Sut was the first out-line of a father spirit which was finally contrived as the Horus-gods, the first gods of Egypt, it is the oldest religious conception of the world.
The first dynasties in Egypt employed the Horus Serekh as their emblem of Rule in the personification of the god they worshiped,
Khasekhemwy name written in a Serekh surmounted by a Horus falcon and set animal facing in the same direction. In another Serekh the two face each other both wearing the double crown wirh the adittional epithat "the two Lord-gods at peace in him," and not merely political…….
In Egypt Amen is figured back to back with Sut-Nebi (or Sebek-Horus) as types of ending and rebeginning. INSERT <>>???/ King peribsen
The Suten-Kings such as Namer, scorpion, Den and King Peribsen and Khasekhem or Khasekhemwy likewise of the rulers and the culture in Mesopotamia and Assyria including Palestine as Egypt ruled by the King.
The serpent and the Falcon-Hawk represents the two-fold god Ra the Holy Spirit personified by the King which are placed upon his brow, as the powers subdued by him through the commands of Ptah, who with Atum, become the male testator and menstrator in the blood (his semen) of the human mother (See Isis figure as the Ape (who turned into man) who menstruates and gestate nine months like the mother) is represented by in his two-fold descent through incarnation as Har-si-hesi “the child of the mother only,” (the name/title given to each King of Egypt) and through begettal as the son of Ra imaged Hawk-headed in the likeness of Ra and/or son who is heir to the matriarchal throne.
The Serekh with falcon Horus and Seth animal as the twins Sut and Horus are figured back to back in the sign of Aries, united like Jesus and Satan who offers to Jesus (or Sut to Horus) the Kingdoms of the two worlds, for the time, during the vernal equinox, (Ritual chapters 4, 75, 80, 110 Lines 4-18, 123, 184 Lines 10-12, chs. 32-35, cf., Matthew 4, Luke 4).
In chapter 110 the speaker says, “Set/Sut, has taken possession of Horus, who looked with the two eyes upon the building around Sekhet-Hetep, but I have unfettered Horus and taken him from Setand Set hath open the ways of the two eyes which are in heaven Set Set hath cast (?) his moisture to the winds upon the soul–that hath–his day–or his eye–and who dwelleth in the city of Mert, and he hath delivered the interior of the body of Horus from the gods of Akert. Behold me now, for I make this mighty boat to travel over the Lake of Hetep, and I brought it away with might from the palace of Shu (the heavenly mansion or city); the domain of his stars groweth young and reneweth its former strength. I have brought the boat into the lakes thereof so that I may come forth into the cities thereof, and I have sailed into their divine city Hetep. And behold, it is because I, even I, am at Peace with his seasons, and with his guidance, (or laws) and with his territory, and with the company of gods who are his first born. He maketh the two divine fighters –i.e., Horus and Set — to be at peace with those who watch over the living ones whom he hath created in fair form, and he bringeth peace — with him –; he maketh the two divine fighters to be at peace with those who watch over them. He cutteth off the hair from the divine fighters, be driveth away storm from the helpless, and he keepeth harm from the Khus. Let me gain dominion within that Field, for I know it, and I have sailed among its lakes so that I might come into the cities. My mouth is strong; and I am equipped–with weapons to use–against the Khus; let them not have dominion over me. Let me be rewarded with thy fields, O thou a god Hetep; that which is thy wish, shalt thou do, O lord of the winds. May I become a khu therein, may I eat therein, may I drink therein, may I plough therein, may I reap therein, may I fight therein, may I make love therein, may my words be mighty therein, may I never be in a state of servitude therein, but may I be in authority therein. Thou hast made strong (?) the mouth and the throat (?) of the god Hetep; Qetetbu is its (?) name.
This same story is similarly told in the New Testament, (cf., Matthew 4 and Luke 4 where Satan takes Jesus up into exceedingly High Mountain and showed him the cities of the world which he offered to him if he would worship him.”
Here Set is in the ascending order of the two in the waxing a waning of the power, (cf., Ritual chapter 80 Lines 5-11).
Compare the following chapters:–
THE CHAPTER OF A MAN COMING FORTH AGAINST HIS ENEMIES IN THE UNDERWORLD. The overseer of the house of the overseer of the seal, Nu, triumphant, saith:–
“O thou god who eatest thine arm, I have departed from thy road. I am Ra, and I have come forth from the horizon against my enemies, and he hath granted to me that they shall not escape from me. I have made an offering, and my hand is like that of the Lord of the ureret crown. I have lifted up my feet, even as the uraei goddesses rise up. My overthrow shall not be accomplished, and as for mine enemy he hath been given over into my power and he shall not be delivered from me. I shall stand up like Horus, and sit down like Ptah, and I shall be mighty like Thoth, and I shall be strong like Tem. I shall therefore walk with my legs, I shall speak with my mouth, I shall go round about in the quest of mine enemy, and as he hath been delivered over to me he shall not escape from me,” Ritual ch. 11.
And in THE CHAPTER OF THE PASSAGE THROUGH THE TOMB and THE SPEARING OF THE
SERPENT (OR SATAN); it is said by the speaker,” depart from me O thou that hast lips which gnaw, for I am Khnemu the lord of Peshennu and I bring the words of the gods (the laws of the ancestors) to Ra, and I report my message to the lord thereof,” Ritual chs. 36, 4 cf., chs. 9-11, Matthew 4, Luke 4, (See Ritual ch. 112 Lines 7-8).
TEXT (1) THE CHAPTER OF DRIVING BACK THE EATER OF THE ASS. Osiris Ra, triumphant, saith:–
I. Get thee back, thou impure one, thou abomination of Osiris ! Taht hath cut off thy head, and I have performed upon thee all the things which the company of the gods ordered concernong thee in the matter of the work of thy slaughter. Get thee back thou abomination of Osiris, from the nsehmet boat…. which advanceth with a fair wind ye are holy all of ye gods, and ye have cast down head-long the enemies of Osiris ; thegods of ta-ur shout for joy. Get thee back, O thou Eater of the Ass, thou abomintion of the god Abu who dwelleth in the underworld. I know thee, I know thee, I know thee, I know thee, Who art thou ? I am Abu (Osiris)……..
2.On thy face O fiend, devour me not, for I am pure, and I am with the time which cometh of itself. Thou shalt not come to me, O thou that comest without being invoked, and whose tim of coming is unknown. I am the Lord of thy mouth, get thee back, thou and thy desires. Hail, Abu, with his flint knife Horus hath cut asunder thy members, and thou art destroyed within thy company, and thy bend, (or dwelling-place) is destroyed for thee by the company of the gods who dwell in the cities of Pe amd Tepu. He that slay thee there is in the Eye of Horus, and I ahve driven thee away s thou wast advancing, and I have vanquished thee by the wind of my mouth. O thou Eater of those who commit sins, who doest plunder and spoil, I have commited no sin ; therefore let my pallete and the writings with hostile charges against me upon them be given unto me. I have done no wrong in the presence of the sovereign princes, therefore shoot not thy venom at me. I give, do thou take according to what I order ; snatch me not away, and eat me not, for I am the Lord of life. the prince of (life, health, strength) of the horizon, Ritual ch. 40..
The rigid discipline of Afrikan sacred societies contains techniques and elements of problems solving and prevention of social inconsistencies and of physical and psychological healing either through administration of herbal medicines and Para psychical diagnosis group therapy based upon ancestral descent and treatment, including pseudo response, or the human psychologies associated with being of common descent of one blood, one heart, of the uterine group.
***********************************
THE BASIS OF AFRIKAN THEOLOGY: – Tradition practise
Our present knowledge of Afrikan social anthropology and religious beliefs grew out of an historical context of race, of occupation, forced labour and slavery which was influenced and cultivated by the greed of the upper class of Europe and ambitious politicians effected through the poverty of the poor who were used as tools of exploitation from one little quarter of Europe who were used by those who were privileged and has such have afflicted the world with the cruel avarice disease of individual greed and pauperism, depravation and starvation and the contraction by Afrikan nationalism which results in ethnic conflicts and also of black resistance, and resentment of their white oppressors and even of their black counter-part which was later defined as communism that stifled the genuine expression of our struggle which is not merely economic.
These arise out of the ensuing political economy of the European nation state and their secular systems guided by their churches and their Parliament, the Home Office, the Foreign Office and colonial administration supported by the British Army aided by private interest racist individuals and/or groups and religious assumption about other races through their interpretation of the bible concerning the soul of man from a Judeo-Christian perspective and European anthropological studies, from the same historical perspective which were influenced by the ideologies of those same institutions like the Royal Geographical Society from which perspective it has become totally narrowed in its focus and inclusive of administrative and colonial archives – a respond to “the history of Afrikan religion,” (By Ranger and Kimambo).
The Positive meaning of life is in association with ones group (a ones only reality within our existentialism) which is expressed through mythical representations which are the history of human origin, their bonding, and cultural development as a particular people with common ties – not an history of man defined by one branch of the species, and not unlike many Afrikan tribes who are also designated, “the chosen people.” The history of human cultural development is not based upon the present interpretation of the bible an its affiliated science theories derived from a socio-psychological mental perception cultivated through biblical teachings or the moral teachings of a one god, or the expression of the social conflict adjustments through political history of Europe and Judeo-Christians and the economic engineering cultivated for the purpose of individual self-benefit for some – connived with by all – politically.
Because the domocratic freemarket practise, and its so-called moral ethical views of are one and the same, and its victims the innocent and the guilty are varied like the terroist, or drugs addicts and criminals, in the streets of Europe as they are in Afrika, the Middle East, Asia or South America, or Australia as they were in the September 11th incident instigated by the complicity of our democratically elected governments who have a responsibility to construct a foreign policies that should safeguard the livelihood of all by providing for others what we want for ourselves in view of their engagement of others (through trade or Aid) in their socio-economical and deomcratic processes, which is tinged with racial and economic victimisation which are still peretuated in the present time through robbery with violence and premeditated murder slavery and exploitation upon people by others with all its contagious systems becuase they think themselves superior and/or disadvantaged (like the European descendants exported, or migrated as settlers to those foreign countries like Canada America, Austrailia, Afrika or the West Indies) who sees these advantages and the the social previliges it creates as their attainment in the Christian providence, or the fulfillment of the Jewish salvation they have created on earth for themselves?.
The victims (sacrifical) of these actions creates other victims (even on the streets of Europe or in the land they have settled) which should be seen as the blood-sacrificed for whatever the present cause celebre, be it the economy which muitiplies more money for the investors, or lessen it through workers demands, or the price of the scarce resources (oil or raw material) which cause interest rates to rise – their primary concern.
Like the Romans before them black people are utilised and dehumanised by modern
Christian European ideologies or concepts, which is not based the practise of any morality, (i.e., the common or collective view of the community versus the view of the individual choice (voice) of, or from the selected few which become the authority “given” through the democratic process) but of exploitation for the purpose of so-called progress which at most times, in relation to developed used of technological ideologies of advancement and modernisation under the guise of exploring and discoveries and/or expeditions of egalitarian humanization that stole and, later exploit and enslave and oppress black people. But ironically, it is European culture that has had the most deadly effect upon us as a people.
************************************
Compensation and reparation are the rules, rather than the exception, as in Europe where the mechanism mandatory in penitence (see penitentiary) for punishment retribution and revenge (a purgatorial …????), cultural practise bearing on the religious, of the British executive legislative and judicial administration as that which is nevertheless immolated by the judgment of god upon the soul in spirit when the offences and other social deviancies committed by individuals in those social circumstances are instigated by the social injustice of the society against people which was the duty of the church to redress.
Even death itself, if not at old age, is seen as a disturbance of the natural equilibrium, and which is not seen as natural, but is attributed to some external first cause, because nothing in their philosophy is without an ultimate cause beyond the immediate cause, such as jealousy, or some evil wish or thought projected at the individual usually stemming from a quarrel, or the will of god where the retributive fate from ritual debt because only the understanding and explaining of death which can make it acceptable – where the aetiology of death is little known. This science du concret its restless probing into causes and motivation is stubbornly optimistic, and it has to be made in the reliance of the interior logical of all things, and all behaviour in the personal and the social dimension.
Accusation of sin (or being born in sin) and admonition of its consequences in these Afrikan intrafamily (or affliction of the human-soul in matters of injustice) matters of coveting one’s neighbour’s wife or husband, pushing your own carer at the expense of others, fornicating with forbidden relatives, breaking out in acts of violence to justify wrong, is not enough ; and Afrikans like other people has seek less mystical deterrents for transgression, and public opinion is one of these and youthful training in the ceremonies of young-man-making, initiation and circumcision is another..
The elders of the clans of each family -group played a part in the role of the Kingship (each also strived to have a voice at court in the person of a bribe for the King) which was associated with clan linages and the contribution of each clan corresponding to the role played by the various (seven) ancestor-figures (or gods) in relation to the person and the duties they each at periodic time, according to the pantheon, respectively, and sucessively performed the reign of the King who were the first company of the gods with the godhead as one among them in “the coming forth to day,” or the evolution of Tem-Khepera, who says,” I came into being from unformed matter I germinate (i.e., as plants) and I conceal myself as the turtoise,”(chapter 83, cf., 23, 24, 82, 84, 164). It was under the forms Khepera imaged as plants, animals, reptiles and insects that the soul of god evolved as the created things, not as man, evolving for plants and animals, but soul throuhg its stages of development were typified as the species which evolved or originated and was depicted as such as it is recorded in totemism) which in the sociology, was represented as the clan heads and also depicted the one blood in their origins from the matriarch and by extension the Queen mother, which links them with the King identified according to their groups by the totemic types. The King clan represneting human spirit of the human personage or god who came in human form, image or likeness and the clans identified by the totemic types were his Lions, Rams fishes, fruiful boughs, Asses, the Beetles (or Crabs) the Bulls excetra etc. Each clan represents a particular skill which was employed in the service of the King assimilated to the role played by the clan ancestor in the struggle against the enemy of the dark in their coming into being with the ancestor-god now represented by the King. Likewise in the cycles of the pantheon of the gods rotates, and which also corrsponds with the clan lineage heads which makes each clans sucessively the nearest to the King as mauf or mouth-piece of the King, his chancellor or holders of other offices.
As such the King was the arbitrater of the laws of the ancestors and the keeper of the peace among the clans, He would decide the contentions of the rights of each clans land of food (the clans were demarcated according to the division of food types), who could make war against whom, and where and when, for the common good of all.
Likewise the King knew all the protocal of the ancestor-god(s) pertaining to the clans and associated with the rites of the whole people (i.e., the seven/fourteen or twelve/thirty-six clans) and was the chief-priest of them all who performed all the annual rites pertaining to each one, or ordined priests who performed them on his behalf.
The Mande says the hoe is the culture of Afrikan and all of them should know it, i.e., agriculturists, personified by the Afrikan-Egyptian king.
For example Mande signifies “son of a person” (Ma) the person being Faro whose first bodily form was the Silurian fish (Pisces) the type of male and female fish (See Boso Tribe who will find a person from another tribe share the totemic fish whenever one is caught.
The other male twin Faro while in heaven took the form of a twin fishes(mannogo).
Faro was portrayed by the two fishes (Ithychus the fish-god or Jesus in the Pisces). The first represents his strength and his life, and the second his body.
For example in Mande social culture, one of the largest ethnic group in Afrika which extends from Ghana, Nigera Mali in West Afrikia to the northeast Sudan they are known as Keita and other names, consist of the Horonw and the nyamakalaw. The Horonw are the people of the earth and are agriculturalists from which the Kings comes. They live in the cities, while the nayamakalaw are an endogamous group who lives in bush or on the suburbs in villages and possess and control the spiritual energies or powers of nature which he Mande call Nyama. The two group, neither of which is subordinate, look upon each other with disfavour and the two play off each other in a symbotic manner. But the two gruops are dependent upon each other, as for example, the Horonw needs the nyamakalaw to carve headderss ritual mask and other emblems for their religious rites, while the nyamakalaw depend upon the Noronw for their produce and economic trade. This cultural balance and its is he basis mode construct of Afrikan social systems which was continued in Egypt and Nubia, (or Upper and Lower Egypt) of the mundane and the sacered or magical, clam and wild, hot and cold (Revlation >…??????) which is expressed Mande cultural attitude and is expressed in their cosmology based personified by Faro and Pemba the two twins like Sut and Horus Abram and Lot, or Esau and Jacob which is also expressed geographically and cosmologically the sociological or physical division being based upon the matrilineal descent which is primary.
The matrilineal social system in Afrika divides into two counterpoise groups, which express the division north and south, indicated by the twins or father and son in one aspect, or the mother and child or brother and sister in another, or the nuetron and proton, hot and cold and is expressed in the Mande by the Horonw and the Nyamakalaw social system which are not clearly defined because the roles played by the two overlaps, (See Sut and Horus).
The social interaction between the two conterpoise-groups (the common cultural social structure found all over Afrika) is truely scientific, patterened upon the perception of the creation imaged by the twins, males or female-male, which was called into being in the begenning was expressesd as the creative verb or divine speech imaged or named by the totemic types, and are portrayed in the sign language as the carved statutes, figures or amulets which was replicated in the funerary rites of the King recorded in picture-writings as the narration of their origins which is also the basis of their continued existence.
For example the blood line as the source of the matrilineal law as guide of the clans, including inheritance was extended to the patrilineal rules as the blessings of the groups. The spiritual unity is expressed by the twin males, the uncle and nephew or the father and son and the blessings, or the two mother/sisters, or eldest daughter and mother. The one social structure balances the other — in their interractions – like the neutron and proton, hot and cold, and in the star or atom.
Likwise, the god Atum is delineated as a seven-fold being dual in character one in personality.
It is the totem as a sign of the processes in the phenomenal world that will explain the origin and the socio-cultural, (not the historical), development of the two groups.
Thence Queen Hat-shep-su says, “The two Hours-gods (Sut-Hours) has united the two horizons (north and south) for me, I rule over this land like the son of Isis. I am victorious like the son of Nut.” (Inscription of Queen hat-shep-su).
The above was taken from a Hymn to Amen-Ra and perverted as Jewish history….
Picture-writings of the walls of numerous officials of the King shows the envoys from all the lands of the nears east visiting the King(s) of Egypt bringing gifts and seeking his blessings or support for their rule as the keeper of the order and harmony, (See Thothmes iii above).
The monuments in Afrika were set up as remembrance of the teachings of the ancestors throughout the ages, (now destroyed by Babylon and the Arabs, and taken away to the four quarters of the earth, including the gold artefacts – and even the mummies, and the very so-called idols in gold to be adored or worshipped, as did they ascribe to those same so-called idols (2 Kings 23, Hosea 2) but which in Afirka were the signs and emblems carved into wood of in stones and in the picture-writings of the recorded history of our forefathers cultural development, in the absent of photography and the written literature which was described by the phonograms which supplement the hieroglyphs letters of the texts as the verbs and nouns as in their later alphabet, which preserved the thoughts of our forefathers, (which they now tell us (Christian and Muslims alike) to leave behind because they are idols so as to pre-occupy us with their god who teach them to murder people, even their one another, and for us to serve their own agenda, of material accumulation and money with our own resources with our labour) later perverted in the bible as a racial inheritance, of property and ownership of land and even other peoples, (See the system of usury introduced into Egypt by Joseph, Genesis and the church indolent in the slave trade through owner of share in neo-colonial and present investments in South Afrika and other places.
From their cultural practise the Judaic religious literature which influence European political ideologies, and social moral practise of race, property and money introduced a system of slavery which became institutionalised in Europe as a cultural practise, from the fields to the factories (See “The Condition of the Working Class Population in the 18th Century, (by Feuerbach) the thesis from Marx and Engel’s wrote their dialectical materialism and hence Communism, (See Exodus 21, Leviticus 25, Deuteronomy 15:12-18, Isaiah 61:55-7), but religious ideology illustrates, when observed in democratic political practise, the perversion as is demonstrated by their of their moral integrity which is supposed to be righteous and upright…???? and superiority (pulmugated through the church) through occupation, robbery with violence and pre-meditated murder, expressed as a political ideology called religion (when the Germans in Namibia, the Dutch in South Afrika, the English Europeans in Australia, New Zealand or America (north and south) believed and effect a designs in the form of social engineering to establish their beliefs as a social practise through the Jewish religious literature which was geared to accumulate resources of other peoples food, clothe and shelter for sale on the stock market (as was the Afrikan person upon the stock) in Europe In the capitalist system of the free market, founded upon slavery stabilised through the biblical writings as a Judeo-Christian social institution, along with usury (Genesis 47:13-26, Exodus 21, (Isaiah 61:5-7) Leviticus 25, who hate oppression for Israel, but love injustice for others, Isaiah 61:8), derived from a Jewish social culture ; which was founded upon a culture, of robbery with violence and premeditated murder called conquest and empire ; but which was serfdom in Europe, and called slavery only when applied to Afrikans, so has to racially marginalise and ostracise and kill black people, among whom they themselves were forced to seek refuge from their European Kings, Lords and nobles and the emerging middle class, through the creation of a system of wage labourer, from the field and/or the plantation to the factory, and through criminalisation for being lazy or a non-worker, and imprisonment and/or exportation of them to foreign lands, where their heirs, now still has the best land that was gained by fraud and deceit and/or through force of arms, for agriculture (see also the social phenomena of Europe at the time) and now manage the rest of the land for the purpose of economic growth in their own countries in Europe, and tourism for their own self benefit, and who now presently live in a paradise of luxury, among the dead and dying in Afirkan, Asia and other places, to effect wealth and maintain perpetual economic growth in the mother country (the original goal which had inspired the invasion under the auspices of the state of first the Catholic personified by the Pope, and secondly Anglican church of England personified by the King, (See the pope of Rome Constantine, and William invasion of England, what they believe then, about Afrikans and people of Afrikan descent, that they still practise today, and teach to their children from one generation to the next, (See Steven Laurence and Anthony Walker).
If democracy means participation in a society which dispenses equal alienable right and justice to all its citizens accordingly, then Afrikan societies are the root models of democratic participation (not the Magna Carta of the English Barons forced upon King Richard which limited it to their own self-interest, and in tax refund and other social and economic favours etc., that still continues today maintained through the courts and its laws, common, legal and criminal, which undermines the democratic freedom of the people), even extremely so because they resist any alienation of the individual from within the roots of the social system (totemic) of the community actions of self-rule (as the balance of the “given,” power not the means of control over others) and the ever present awareness of exactly where and through whose hands the power line runs, and for what purpose.
Soh, instead, all the social psychology and other cultural mechanism to contrives corporation was directed to incorporate the individual as a part of the group, not to alienate and exclude, because you become, or was born poor, and hence likely to become, or is, a criminal etc., and if as the American present system goes, if you cannot be and redeemed by your fellow men, how can you (and they as Christians) be redeemed in heaven.
From within this human bonding of African social structure there could be no fundamental changes in the universal or social order of things for future contemplation in relation to the
Perpetuation of the human species, or of individual material accumulation… time being eternal
(Instituted in the social structure based upon the moral and ethical teachings of the totemic
Laws of the ancestral gods — Messengers or prophets), in which there was no deviation; no
Lower or higher degree of things (for ruler or ruled), in human benefit or material gain.
Acts of cruelty were those or anything that was not directed to this end
Opposed to this rule.
The results of these beliefs is true sacrosanct and leave no room for deviation (for ruler or ruled subject within the unity principle) which is the antecedent for survival for all and not only some, and any other wise would be a in or evil which is anything that threatened the social good of all.
In other words the predominance of the humanistic traditions in African philosophy and its holistic beliefs are absent in European social practice and religion.
That is to say, the drama of the divine projected in, or, by the human personality or soul in which the King was the normaliser of the social neurotic and the maladjustment of mental processes in the ritual technique of self-entrenchment (or enchantment) and divination which was associated with efforts to ensure success and to avoid disaster.
The effect forces of the ancestral charters geared to conversation was religiously sanctioned as medical, magical, scientific, political and socio-cultural. Because the disintegration of other societies should remind modern ones that if a society is based upon material acquisition, through conquering, pillage robbery with violence premeditated aggravated murder, enslavement, like the present ones, then is just blood and fire…….
The Rites de passage is a state of being (transitory) from one state or form to the other. Afrikan rituals and their systems wears an ambivalent face as a means of reconciling conflicts or dichotomies within a given natural order within the roots of causality in human relationships and society, the family structure (first the sisterhood upon which the brotherhood was founded upon which the fatherhood was in turn founded, Numbers 24. – Heart and tongue… Here the creation of tension and hostility between groups stimulates loyalties to the groups concerned and increased solidarity and aid the smoothing segmental (or community) group-tension…
In male groups association the force interaction of collective creativity is enhanced by p
One could ask themselves, how much has been gained materially, by the common European
Person, man and woman, from slavery and other forms of exploitation atrocities and the shedding of blood.
Europeans in relation to the poor are in the same position now as they were then at the time of those events.
But the real question is, how did the civilised majority of so-called modern Europeans allowed a
Few to use Race and Religion, (and still do) in whatever description, from a Euro-centric
perspective of trickery and coercion, as a tool of Inter-ethnic Warfare in Africa and other lands, followed by oppression and injustice for the implementing of cultural “racial” nationalism and other forms of exploitation, that has thwarted the ideological independence of other people; that has left them isolated and in degenerated social depravation which has persist till today based upon, an ideology by which black people was sacrificed for the illusion of European success… called progress.
“Treaties” and “Agreements” from a European perspective ethics are at most times immoral (in social relation or politics) and deceitful in terms of African traditional conceptual thinking of common ownership including property which as kinship inheritance cannot be signed away (a tradition practiced by Aristocrat families in Europe – but denied others in their own country) but is transmitted down to successive generations. But ours was appropriated by force, legality and trickery by Europeans, (Benin, Ashanti, India, etc.
The legalising of this helps to illustrate:
(1)
A European self-image,
(2)
A strategy of political disarmament and psychological intimidation from the premises of
Evolution, development and progress; and superiority.
(3)
of codified laws of modern civilized societies from which according to European ideology,
comes order and legal assures – “the European civilized way” from a European socio-moral perspective.
The traditional laws of the people concerning land tenure wasn’t good, it was primitive and
Out-dated and the custom did not stipulate that the people own the land. But written law was
Civilize therefore ownership was legal.
The idea started with the Romans against the Barbarians and was continued with the Europeans against the Afrikans whom for those purpose “they called savages” but were later called Communist-Terrorist because they demand their land back and intend to get it
Back even by the same way it was taken or by any means necessary. Which now, at most times, eventually manifest itself in inter-ethnic warfare devised by the real terrorist to prevent?
the land being retrieve and/or from protecting land left or appropriated to others or to counter local political threats to laws imposed by European and political terms of international
(Community) relationship base upon the same exploitation of Rome that is now practice by
The civilized democratic community, to undermine legitimate struggle for self-determination and
Freedom from colonial domination.
The hypocrisy of these social phenomena and their happenings within the borders of the
Civilized countries to black people (and Irish immigrants) in England and America… and
Europe in general. Or to people in general in their own country of origin, i.e., African, Turks, Indians in America, Arabs in Palestine, Mexico, Mozambique, Anglo, South Africa, South America etc. It would seems, that to be civilized, is to develop the ingenuity to conceal
One’s motives and not to make it occupation or intervention “too obvious.” If there is the initial need for some draconian measures then these should quickly be pacified by legal
“What we are experiencing at this cycle is merely the group mind, society, growing up as a whole , so from childhood through current adolescence to a future adulthood.”
Wrong, we as society are in the senile old phase, and we as a group the fire to rebirth the phoenix, back to where it should be, back to where we know we’ll be.
with a General Election in Great Britain next May 2015 it is more Important than ever to reclaim Our Country from the LibLabCon and throw out the EU/ECHR with Immediate effect