Creating Sovereign Law – Practice and Procedure
Article and sample documents courtesy of Matt
Affidavit process
It troubles me to see so many messing around with PCNs, debt collectors, statutes etc. The affidavit process below is to hopefully give you an option to free you from all that.
Q. Would you like a lawfully binding way to stop messing around with arguing FIXED PENALTY CHARGES, debt collectors, council tax, utility companies, TV licensing etc? A way that creates the lawfully binding and irrefutable void between you and the legal ‘person’ and can demonstrate to all parties that you as a man/woman are not lawfully liable for any public entity or public debt/liability; as well as any other FACTS that you may want to use for a particular purpose?
I am guessing the answer is yes. Then Affidavits, I believe, are your way forward.
A ‘private’ affidavit, if the whole process is done correctly, creates a ‘lawfully’ binding agreement/contract between the parties that rises far, far above any ‘legal’ contract/agreement; in fact as paperwork goes, an affidavit from the ‘private’ side is superior to all other documents, full stop! You could go as far as to term the private un-rebutted affidavit as ‘Sovereign Law’ because an affidavit from the private side and sworn under unlimited commercial liability indicates that a sentient living private man/woman is behind it, and therefore a Sovereign. (Warning – Please make sure that whatever you put on an affidavit is your truth).
I have attached an affidavit for you to peruse and use if you wish. I have actually used this affidavit in a slightly longer format, yet I have removed a few points that I used as they may have been confusing to some, yet as you will see the points on the attached affidavit create an agreement (law of the parties) that would cover, I believe, every eventuality between the private (real) and public (fiction). If you cannot stand-under any of the points on the attached affidavit then remove them or research them until you are convinced without a shadow-of-doubt that they are now your truth.
Do NOT use affidavits lightly. Research what you are doing if you are unsure. Affidavits are simple and incredibly powerful law documents. There is nothing to be fearful of whilst using them, but please comprehend what you are doing before firing them off!
Q. How does this affidavit create an agreement of the parties?
A. Because of Tacit Procuration and Stare Decisis (see below for more on stare decisis). Tacit Procuration basically means ‘silent agreement’ (agreement through acquiescence) and this is the reason why ignoring documents is considered a lethal act in Admiralty Law. If the Respondent does not respond then he/she is simply saying, “Yes I agree/affirm by my acquiescence.” Tacit procuration enables what is commonly known as ‘self authenticating contracts.’
Q. Why use a Notary Public?
A. The reason Notary Public verification on important documents is so powerful is because simply, in effect, by the time you have a Notice of Default signed and sealed by a Notary you have ‘lawful’ summary judgement which cannot be overturned, as long as your paperwork and process is correct. (By the way, if at a later date you discover your paperwork is lacking in some way, then simply create another one with all the corrections on. Remember, every party has to have the ability to exhaust their administrative remedies, and creating an affidavit is part of that process). Quite simply you now have ‘STARE DECISIS’ – Lat; “to stand by that which is decided.” The principal that the precedent decisions are to be followed by the courts; and you also have ‘RES JUDICATA’ – Lat; decided or determined by judicial power; a thing judicially decided; a judgement that is considered final and bars re-litigation on the same matter. A Notary is the judicial power! Also important is the fact that a Notary can act as a conduit between the private and public in regards to ‘foreign’ jurisdiction; a solicitor cannot do this. Private is classed as foreign to the public.
One of the great deceptions of official agencies is the use of the Stare Decisis doctrine. Stare Decisis originates from Common Law courts and it is in Common Law that the principles of precedent decisions exist. Precedent decisions do not have to be used in Admiralty courts: http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Admiralty
So an official agency sends another party a document. The document gets ignored (lethal in Admiralty), and so the agency sends out a follow up of some kind. If the document gets ignored again then the Common Law doctrine of ‘Stare Decisis’ gives the official agency summary judgement; the case is now already decided and cannot be argued.
Q. What is a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and why do I need to use one?
A. A Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure is correct procedure and therefore gives the Affiant uncompromised standing. There may be a very genuine reason why the Respondent couldn’t respond; maybe a death in the family, maybe they were hospitalized etc. So you are saying, “just in case there is a genuine reason why you couldn’t respond I am kindly granting you a further three (3) days to respond. You are being nice, and so you should be, as you want to stay honourable at ALL times.
Q. Do I have to put all the points on my affidavit?
A. No of course not. Make sure it is your truth and besides you can always create more affidavits at anytime. Affidavits create ‘your’ law; law between the parties. So if you are not happy with their law, create your own. Yours are far more powerful in every single way if done correctly. Your affidavit can have one single point or hundreds; it is your document so you can make it whatever you want and for whatever suits your purpose.
Q. Why is a private affidavit so powerful?
A. Basically because as a private man/woman you can operate under unlimited commercial liability and public entities cannot. You see all public entities have what is called a ‘scope of office’ – which is basically a job description and conditions for which they have limited liability insurance cover. For instance, if a Police Officer believes that you are becoming threatening or aggressive he can make the decision to use appropriate force to restrict and arrest you. Now if in the tussle you fell and broke your arm, the Police Officer does not have to worry about prosecution because using appropriate force in this situation is in his ‘scope of office’ and therefore falls under his limited liability insurance policy. But, if the Police Officer was to punch you in the face whilst you were sat in your car, he can now be prosecuted for a criminal offence. If the prosecution stands then his insurance would not cover him in anyway. Therefore he could do jail time, be fined and lose his job as his actions did not fall under his insured ‘scope of office.’ EVERY public official, agent and employee has a ‘scope of office’ – that’s worth remembering!
In commerce, the game is won by the party who took the biggest risk, and as you sign under unlimited (full) commercial liability, the public entity cannot match that as they are under limited liability; unless they are willing to forego this and risk losing their own possessions and career; as far as I know no public entity has ever wanted to take that risk, understandably as they know they are involved in fiction. This is why it is also worthy of reiterating that you should only put your truth on an affidavit, because if it turns out that you have deliberately lied then you risk your commercial credibility for life; and anyway it is against EVERY law to use fraud/lies in your contracts, as so it should be, so DON’T do it! (I have listed some Maxims of law near the bottom of the page concerning affidavits so you can ascertain yourself why affidavits are seen as so powerful).
Q. Can the Respondent just return it?
A. Yes, but then they haven’t responded to the points raised so they are instantly at fault, so you can continue with the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure due to non response. Damned if they do and damned if they don’t springs to mind.
Q. Can the Respondent just respond with something like, “I disagree with point 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 17, and 21.”
A. Yes they can, but once again they would be at fault. A Maxim of Law states, “An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.” And any rebuttal must have evidence provided to the Affiant to demonstrate why the Affiant’s point isn’t true, and the Respondent needs to provide his/her rebuttal in sworn affidavit form. Now as long as you have your believed truth on the affidavit, they are NOT going to rebut your facts with their fiction, guaranteed!
The process is as follows:
1. Print out your affidavit on very high quality paper. I would recommend something like ‘Southworth’ Cotton paper, but if finances won’t allow then try and find the best quality you can afford because this affidavit will become a valuable document to you.
2. Visit a Notary Public to attend an ‘Affidavit Oath Swearing’ and make sure you take a valid passport and a current utility bill or bank statement as the Notary will require these for ID purposes. You will be in the Notaries office for no longer than about 30 minutes. (I also recommend that you buy a small ink pad so you can put your thumbprint seal next to your autograph for added validity and security, yet if you are uncomfortable with this then simply leave this part out). If you do not want to use a Notary then use two (2) private witnesses on the affidavit, Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure, but do get the Notice of Default Notarised. This is still very effective, saves money and you are still getting summary judgement; although with certain documents I would suggest getting the whole process Notarised if possible for the added weight and your own psychological confidence.
3. Photocopy the entire affidavit and then use the supplied ‘Certified Copy’ template to run the photocopied affidavit back through your printer whilst adding/printing the ‘Certified Copy’ details. (The Holder in due course of a document can lawfully make true, correct and complete copies of the originals; and the holder in due course in this instance is the Claimant/Affiant). NEVER SEND THE ORIGINALS – THEY ARE YOUR VALUABLE EVIDENCE THAT A LAWFUL AGREEMENT EXISTS! Sign and date the certified copies.
4. Post the copies using Special Delivery, and I would suggest within 48 hours of the Notaries verification. KEEP THE POSTAL RECEPTS SAFE WITH THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 14 + days time.
5. Prepare a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure, again using high quality paper, and continue the same process as above giving the Respondent the set amount of time to respond. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 7 + days time.
6. Prepare a Notice of Default and once again continue with the above process. Once you have a ‘default’ judgement from the Notary you now have a bona fide lawfully binding agreement/contract.
Now if you so wish, every time that you need to inform a ‘public’ entity that you have a lawful agreement with Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister (or whoever) then simply make another ‘Certified Copy’ and send it to them; the affidavit copy and the default copy. If they still dare to proceed (extremely unlikely), maybe subpoena the CEO of the UK, in this instance Gordon Brown… it would be a laugh and raise a few eyebrows hey! In truth once you have a valid and lawful agreement you shouldn’t even be going to court, that’s their little playhouse of fairytales, so let them keep it and take care of your business administratively on the private side.
I remember studying what is sometimes (erroneously in my opinion) called ‘Commercial Redemption’ under Winston Shrout and I would hear Winston say the following statement on many occasions, “If you don’t like their law, then create your own.” For months I didn’t grasp quite what he meant and Winston is a great teacher (spiritually as well as commercially), and so I believe he was waiting for folk to ‘have the ears to hear’ this particular loaded message, yet I received the light-bulb moment early whilst watching and studying Winston’s ‘Commercial Lien’ DVD (which I highly recommend). My often research buddy and friend, Guy, had the very same light bulb moment a few weeks later whilst watching the exact same DVD without any interaction between us regarding this matter, and so we knew we were on to something when we shared our individual experiences. Then Guy met with Winston at a private seminar and informed him of what we were currently doing and showed him our private material; Winston was suitably impressed and informed Guy that our method was absolutely rock solid and the correct and lawful procedure. To be truly honest we already sensed this but of course it is always a pleasure to receive confirmation from someone who has inspired your learning. Since then we have had this information confirmed time and time again, yet as stated before, we didn’t really need this confirmation as our confidence in this process felt very solid; and once you realise who you really are I am sure you will comprehend, or already do comprehend, what I am talking about.
Remember it is the agreement of the parties that is important. Their law is contract law, and theirs is built on fraud and deception, so create the contracts that you want, not what they want, and yours will be built on fact and truth. If they do not rebut or reply to your paperwork (they won’t) then you have a ‘lawfully binding’ agreement that no other party can lawfully or legally impair. By the way, if the respondent violates the contract then you have instant lien right, but that is for another day. My personal opinion is this; affidavits and maritime liens (which are affidavits of obligation from the private side) wipe the floor of everything in their laughable and weak fictional system.
Maxims of law. (Affidavit based)
An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
An un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.
An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.
(Research on Maxims with large sample listing)
If you don’t like the idea of creating and sending in such an elaborate affidavit as the one provided, and yet you have situations that would benefit from getting the other party into an agreement, then just a very few points can have an almighty effect. Example:
Affiant is a private living sentient man.
Affiant is not JOHN SMITH or any other artificial entity/legal fiction.
The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
The Affiant is not liable for JOHN SMITH or any artificial derivative thereof at anytime whatsoever.
The Affiant is not liable for any public debts/liabilities at any time whatsoever.
The Affiant is not a member of any society whatsoever and therefore the Affiant is not bound by any society’s statutes, rules or codes.
Now if the above six (6) points are your truths (and they should be) and you put them on an affidavit to the Respondent, the Respondent has to provide evidence to the contrary of all the 6 points if they want to rebut. I think you can see for yourself that they won’t be able to do that. I think you will also notice that you don’t even have to use the above 6 points; 1 would be enough for most cases, but try and think of any situation you are involved with that couldn’t be solved by having a lawfully binding agreement/contract such as the above.
Folks;
Stop messing around in fear, controversy, statutes, and other self limiting ways; many of the limiting ways I witness on this and many other forums. Create the law you want with the corporate entities. Once you realise who you are and why your true identity and power has been kept at bay, you will realise why a private sovereign affidavit is so powerful. Keep your original affidavits very safe and keep ‘certified copies’ on you at all times. An enforcement agent will only proceed so far after they have checked the validity of your paperwork; because you will have made sure of the following:
You know who and what you are.
You know what you are not.
You are working through your anger, resentment and blame issues.
You have stopped being a victim in life.
You are realising that only you have the power to make you feel.
You are working towards treating ALL others with understanding, patience, forgiveness, empathy and tolerance.
You offer your self in service to others at some points throughout your day/week.
Your law/agreement documents are correct.
Soon we can all be sending our law to ‘thingy me-jig’ d/b/a President of Europe. Oh what larks.
If you have any questions whatsoever please contact me and I will endeavour to provide you with an answer/opinion.
Warmest regards,
Matt.
Sample Templates
First of all a big thank you to everyone spreading information and research about all this.
The information i’ve been researching has mainly been to do with freeman-on-the-land and the Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right. Can you tell me what the differences are between a Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right, and an affidavit?
The principals and mechanics of both appear very similar. Also, the understandings (of a Notice) and truths (of an affidavit) that one might choose to include in either a Notice or an affidavit would probably be almost identical (explaining person, statutes, society, etc). So what is the lawfull difference between the two documents?
Thanks in advance
Latest information from FMOTL web site reports that Noatary Public’s are becoming reluctant to cooperate with Freemen of the Land in signing their Affadavits etc.I may well need to pursue an alternative and use witness signatures!
Hi,
Read this article as it provides details describing the process of using private verifiers and then using a Notary to simply get the default notice notarised. https://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/18/toolbox-stop-taking-the-pcn/
Regards, Matt.
how do you enforce this procedure and turn them into liens if needed?
I too am curious about your status with being on benifits. With being a freeman of the land I know you should not be claiming, can you still claim with affadavits? it seems as though you are picking & choosing when you play their game or not? this question was asked earlier with no clear response given. Many thanks. Love the site. Great stuff.
I added these points to mine, in anticipation of vitamines being made illegal and possobly other substances that helps keep us in good health.
• The Affiant reserves the right to assist his fellow living men and women in achieving greater physical and mental wellbeing, using whatever methods, devices and substances that will aid in the achievement of this.
• The Affiant reserves the right to manufacture/import/cultivate/refine/process any natural or artificial substance that may assist in the Affiants endeavour to enhance the physical or mental wellbeing of his fellow man, or for own use.
Kent
If I decide not to use a Notary Public, is it appropriate for the signatures on my Affidavit to be from members of my own familiy? For example, Wife, Parent, Sibling?
I was born in France 1947 and Registered British 1956, so going the affidavite route would I become French again (my French nationality was renounced in 1968), or would I be sovereign as in your case, having renounced my French nationality?
If you are a Freeman, would they be able to charge ‘inheritance tax’? I was in financial services, estate planning was never this easy, what a coup.
The question about your right to move abroad once you have entered this process has not been answered ?
How does this affect your right to live in a foreign country ?
There are mistakes in the Certified Copy document.
Are they going to get corrected?
Whats good this is LaSelle in the usa you say interesting thing about a affidavit ! quick ? can I apply this in U S A
i live in Gibraltar, would i have to write to the Gibraltar government or British?
try asking the authorities.
Just blowing some free time on Digg and I found your article . Not normally what I prefer to learn about, but it was definitely worth my time. Thanks.
One question: what or whom actually constitutes a ‘Noatary Public’? An Officer of the Court? A Barrister? A Priest? A Doctor? Whom does one count as a ‘Noatary Public’?
Phil.
Phil, a Notary Public is a Notary Public. Check out the Notaries’ Society for one near you:
http://www.thenotariessociety.org.uk
When I asked the notary to have the response sent to them as in Me, C/O Notary…They called the bigwigs and said that she was not permitted to be a notary acceptor or be fined $300 dollars if she did. What is happening?
Due to the fact that the templates so generously provided include the name of a specific respondent, is it right to assume that if I wanted to send the same affidavit to a different respondent, I would need to get a new one notarized?
I wish to use this process to defend myself against unjust fixed penalty notices issued by the New Zealand Police. Should I make NZ Police the respondent, or the PM of NZ, or both?
Thanks so much for the effort you have put into sharing this knowledge, this site is a blessing.
I live in Ireland, & am in Court very soon on a family law matter. Is It true that a corporation cannot hold public office? & can I ask the judge who he represents if I am asked to swear on the bible? If it isn’t God, can I assume it is the other guy?
i’ve recently been researching freeman on the land and affidavits do you have any cases of freeman being tried at crown court or can we insist on a court de joure
is it at all possible to state in the affidavit that “the affiant holds the right to travel abroad”, or “the affiant claims possession of their legal entity”? or any other statement allowing you to travel abroad and also keep your own bank accounts?
Hi Matt,
we(a group of a few people here in germany) want to do the Process, and like to know, wether you already can tell of the practical side. What are your experiences till now with officals, and government facilities?
How do they react, or don’t they? Could you give me a summit of your experience so far?
Thanks in advance
Christiane
will I be able to appoint myself as the legal rep of my strawman and claim my pension? peace theonewhoisfree
@matt
what do you think about sending a fee schedule attached to the affidavit. is it just the PM you need to send it to or do you send it to others i.e. the queen, home secretary etc. etc?
HI Matt,
Thank you for such detailed info. I am about to try this for the first time in defence to a parking infringement (in Australia). Could you please tell me what you have intended the ‘Reference # ******’ field for, at the top of your Affidavid Letter?
Michael
Also, when writing Affid to the City Council who should I make the Respondent: the Council CEO or the Lord Mayor?
Michael
Hi Matt,
What a fantastic article, truly inspiring. im not kissing your arse by saying that it just is. If only we all knew this information, the revolution would be televised!! lol
anyways just a quick question? i am self employed in the commercial world, if i was to become a true sovereign through my affidavit how would this affect my work i.e payments from people, rent etc? also i take it i cant use the NHS? can we not ask the NHS to bill our account at HM Treasury??
Keep up the good work!
LaurenceOfBury
can everyone please use the forum for your conversations and questions etc…
https://lawfulrebellion.org/forum/
we will not be publishing anything more than comments that add to the info already here.
Two questions pls:
1. Has anyone found a notary public, who would be willing to sign this type of documents?
2. The more I read about affidavits, the more confusing it gets: there’s one to the queen then there’s one for Gordon Brown and the whole gang of government officials etc., then there’s NUICOR with fee schedules etc
3. Ok, 3 questions, actually 🙂 Has anyone used any of these documents successfully in dealings with courts/police/gov officials/..?
Thank you,
Love and Peace
Anna
Hi Matt,
Have you had anyone who lives in a EU Country (Ex-Pat) file an affidavit into the Prime Minister and the first Lord of the Treasury (most likely empty by now)? I am really chomping at the bit to try it. I live in Malta by the way, been here for fourteen years (early retirement) as a temporary resident, paying income tax, was paying it in the UK until I turned 65 in 2009. Hopeful of a reply. Thanks
Fantastic post. Just discovered it on Google. Thank you so much for that helpful data. Continue to keep up the exceptional work 🙂
To anyone who has the capacity to answer with knowledge as in already done this within last few weeks or so recently considering the dates on this when these affidavits were performed have the Notary Publics caught on to it and rebutted it (protecting the system) or do I still have a chance to get my freedom from the system ?
Your comments greatly appreciated or refer me to one Notary who would do it ? willing to travel to get it UK only respond
To Matt
Please can you let me know a notary public who will process within UK the Affis for me or any other way to execute them
Regards
Jas
Matt,
I have been charged with Criminal Damage, and obviously if I have commited this which is pretty likely then I am happy to offer the loss created party compensation for the inconvenience caused. I believe this is the whole role of insurance in the world and the damage will be covered by his insurance to no extra cost as he did nothing wrong and I am unemployed without savings so have no way of paying for the damage. The other point ot note is I have no memory of this event and there is a possibility I was spiked that night. I am looking at discharging the court due to the fact that none of the fine will actually go to the loss created party, but instead in corrupt, trial without jury, magistrates pockets. I also would be convicted of LEGISLATION: ‘Contrary to sections 1(1) and 4 of the Criminal damage Act. As you can see this is an ‘Act’, therefore I comprehend this to be a ‘Statute’, and thus only applicable to the ‘fictional person aka JAMES ANDREW KEENAN not James Andrew Keenan. So Basically what I am saying is that I should not be going to court for this offence, but dealing with the loss created party in person and mutually agreeing out of pocket expenses and my unreserved apology, especially as I have no idea what happened and may have been spiked…
parking tickets and council tax all seem to be backfiring on me – even though i’ve followed the ‘rules’ stated here, on fmotl and tpuc, i have bailiffs still visiting and the new parking tickets are in danger of being handed to bailiffs.
i have an angry wife, and a child to think about, and all my efforts of notices, affidavits, fee schedules and are being ignored, just like i’m ignoring their correspondence. does anyone have a clear example of repeated success with these or other approaches (such as A4V), as I am teetering on the edge of giving in and needing to find a couple of grand to pay what they say I now owe…
you just have to not give into the illusion funkcamel – that is their only trick.
i understand the sentiment, david. i agree with all of this movement; in fact i see with absolute lucidity how the only practical way to actually stop poverty (and most crime) is to get rid of all forms of finance.
i just want to know, since you are informing people of ways to avoid these financial impositions, that you and others can honestly say that you have repeated success in using them. is that the case? how many can say it is the case for them? i am seeking encouragement, as i have the prospect that bailiffs could enter (e.g. should someone open the door to them unwittingly when i’m not there – unlikely but a possibility)
perhaps i should change from affidavits to a4v, for example, i want to know what is getting (the best) results, so i can move forward brilliantly.
I’m just about to get some decent paper to print this Affidavit (obviously updated to my own truths) and I got a silly question.
It has on each page about an affidavit refrence number, now I assume I just put what-ever reference in there as long as it matches on all pages. Before I go ahead and do that, can anyone confirm about the reference, would one be given to me by the notary public or is it something which I can make up?
Thanks in advance ^.^
please answer this, david and others, i am asking for honest help.
who has succeeded in not paying their pcns, council tax, etc and having the authorities go silent on collecting the ‘debts’? how many of us can say that these tactics are working, and, if so, which tactics are working best?
simple questions that need honest answers if this movement is really going to pick up steam and get others less willing to test these theories.
Hi folks, do you have to resite law if you want too send an affidavit to the police. And is there a time limit on when you can? Such as if it happened years ago, but you can prove it by witnesses but they have not given up video evidence which would prove my point?
Please help they assualted me and I have suffered years of injury.
Much love to this mind-opening movement. I’m only reading the info and listening so far and I am starting to feel the real me again… the original child. Much love My fellow men and women, Much Love.
I have got an un rebutted affadavit stating that I am entitled to Substantial Damages and all legal costs to achieve them from Bridgend County Borough Council. How do I enforce this?
I think i made a huge mistake and want to know if you can help. I did the admin procedure and instead of giving 14 days i gave three days. Can i undo whats been done? Can i still proceed and stand on the principle that it is a private contract that hasnt been rebutted?
Right now I am at a lose.
Hi all. Ref: DCA’S. I first used this document against Equidebt LTD, DCA’S, on behalf of Alliance & Liecester, for the remaining, £2,500, of a £5,000 loan. ( Alledged debt’.), in February 2011…… I e-mailed it to them, and had an ‘acknowledgment’ of it’s contents, stating, they had sent it on the the ‘relevant dep’t’, and would be ‘in touch’, in due course……I have heard ABSOLUTELY NOTHING from them since then…..YIPPEE..!!!!!!!! Nor, have i heard from any other DCA, ref, this particular matter….. As far as i am concerned, that is well, and truly a ‘Victory’ by now eh???, some 10 months later………..
I have also used this ‘same/edited document, against ‘various’ DCA’S, + Solicitors too, who were trying to collect on an ‘overdrawn bank account’, from Lloyds TSB. Approx’ £4,000.
These are in the original order, inwhich i dealt with them……
iQor DCA
Wescot credit
GeoffreyParkerBourne Solicitors A.K.A. GBP
Apex Credit Management
H + L Legal ( Solicitors )
Moorcroft DCA
All of the above fell at this 1st hurdle, except for Moorcroft, who at least made some sort of effort, in a detailed reply, but i just recived another reply, from them, telling me, that they would ‘close’ my account, on their systems, and would be letting Lloyds TSB, deal with me directly.. In other words, i beleive, that they too, are now stumped…..Given the fact, that they ‘all’ seem to of passed it back to Lloyds TSB, i can only beleive, that this remedy, stops them ‘
‘dead in their tracks’… Thus, for me, i have no problem using this method, and i re-iterate, that i actually ‘e-mailed’, ‘ALL’ of the above, and never actually posted anything….
Please feel free to ‘edit the ‘red parts’, in this document, and use it yourself… I have sent it to friends too, whom all, have had success…
It is not my document, but from a template, tho the name of the site, escapes me… If i cannot post it on here, please feel free to e-mail at hatmagic@hotmail.com, and i will gladly forward it on to you. It’s free of course……
Hope this is of some help to you, if you choose to use it..
Be Safe all.
Paul:Williams©
Thank you Paul!
1) You state in your process
4. Post the copies using Special Delivery, and I would suggest within 48 hours of the Notaries verification. KEEP THE POSTAL RECEPTS SAFE WITH THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 14 + days time.
What do I take to the Notary to swear over? The original Affadavit? Where does he sign if he orginally has signed it?
2) I am finding it difficult to find someone who want to notarise it in London. Does someone have a name? Who do you use Matt?
Hi Matt, can you tell me of any drawbacks of using an “Affitdavit” . Would it change my everyday life in anyway, what i mean is, would it change my banking practices.
Pieces of paper generally change our lives as much as we allow them to. Sorry if that seems obtuse but it very much depends what you put on your affidavits and what your intentions are!
It really makes me wonder the validity of these affidavits when very few people have been able to provide proof that they actually work.
Anyone?
I’ve just SUBmitted an affidavit to the effect that I, yes I, am Superman.
As soon as it is unrebutted it stands as truth* and I shall fly to Australia unaided by man made prepulsion contraptions.
Hang on a minute! God would have been even better than Superman. I know what to do, when my affidavit is unrebutted and stands as truth i’ll just fly around the earth so fast i’ll turn back time and then i’ll change my affidavit to read God instead of Superman and once that is unrebutted i’ll command them to cease their knavish antics and upon Divine Command will give up all they have robbed and shall abandon their great deception.
* it only stands as truth in their fictional world…