Creating Sovereign Law – Practice and Procedure
Article and sample documents courtesy of Matt
Affidavit process
It troubles me to see so many messing around with PCNs, debt collectors, statutes etc. The affidavit process below is to hopefully give you an option to free you from all that.
Q. Would you like a lawfully binding way to stop messing around with arguing FIXED PENALTY CHARGES, debt collectors, council tax, utility companies, TV licensing etc? A way that creates the lawfully binding and irrefutable void between you and the legal ‘person’ and can demonstrate to all parties that you as a man/woman are not lawfully liable for any public entity or public debt/liability; as well as any other FACTS that you may want to use for a particular purpose?
I am guessing the answer is yes. Then Affidavits, I believe, are your way forward.
A ‘private’ affidavit, if the whole process is done correctly, creates a ‘lawfully’ binding agreement/contract between the parties that rises far, far above any ‘legal’ contract/agreement; in fact as paperwork goes, an affidavit from the ‘private’ side is superior to all other documents, full stop! You could go as far as to term the private un-rebutted affidavit as ‘Sovereign Law’ because an affidavit from the private side and sworn under unlimited commercial liability indicates that a sentient living private man/woman is behind it, and therefore a Sovereign. (Warning – Please make sure that whatever you put on an affidavit is your truth).
I have attached an affidavit for you to peruse and use if you wish. I have actually used this affidavit in a slightly longer format, yet I have removed a few points that I used as they may have been confusing to some, yet as you will see the points on the attached affidavit create an agreement (law of the parties) that would cover, I believe, every eventuality between the private (real) and public (fiction). If you cannot stand-under any of the points on the attached affidavit then remove them or research them until you are convinced without a shadow-of-doubt that they are now your truth.
Do NOT use affidavits lightly. Research what you are doing if you are unsure. Affidavits are simple and incredibly powerful law documents. There is nothing to be fearful of whilst using them, but please comprehend what you are doing before firing them off!
Q. How does this affidavit create an agreement of the parties?
A. Because of Tacit Procuration and Stare Decisis (see below for more on stare decisis). Tacit Procuration basically means ‘silent agreement’ (agreement through acquiescence) and this is the reason why ignoring documents is considered a lethal act in Admiralty Law. If the Respondent does not respond then he/she is simply saying, “Yes I agree/affirm by my acquiescence.” Tacit procuration enables what is commonly known as ‘self authenticating contracts.’
Q. Why use a Notary Public?
A. The reason Notary Public verification on important documents is so powerful is because simply, in effect, by the time you have a Notice of Default signed and sealed by a Notary you have ‘lawful’ summary judgement which cannot be overturned, as long as your paperwork and process is correct. (By the way, if at a later date you discover your paperwork is lacking in some way, then simply create another one with all the corrections on. Remember, every party has to have the ability to exhaust their administrative remedies, and creating an affidavit is part of that process). Quite simply you now have ‘STARE DECISIS’ – Lat; “to stand by that which is decided.” The principal that the precedent decisions are to be followed by the courts; and you also have ‘RES JUDICATA’ – Lat; decided or determined by judicial power; a thing judicially decided; a judgement that is considered final and bars re-litigation on the same matter. A Notary is the judicial power! Also important is the fact that a Notary can act as a conduit between the private and public in regards to ‘foreign’ jurisdiction; a solicitor cannot do this. Private is classed as foreign to the public.
One of the great deceptions of official agencies is the use of the Stare Decisis doctrine. Stare Decisis originates from Common Law courts and it is in Common Law that the principles of precedent decisions exist. Precedent decisions do not have to be used in Admiralty courts: http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Admiralty
So an official agency sends another party a document. The document gets ignored (lethal in Admiralty), and so the agency sends out a follow up of some kind. If the document gets ignored again then the Common Law doctrine of ‘Stare Decisis’ gives the official agency summary judgement; the case is now already decided and cannot be argued.
Q. What is a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and why do I need to use one?
A. A Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure is correct procedure and therefore gives the Affiant uncompromised standing. There may be a very genuine reason why the Respondent couldn’t respond; maybe a death in the family, maybe they were hospitalized etc. So you are saying, “just in case there is a genuine reason why you couldn’t respond I am kindly granting you a further three (3) days to respond. You are being nice, and so you should be, as you want to stay honourable at ALL times.
Q. Do I have to put all the points on my affidavit?
A. No of course not. Make sure it is your truth and besides you can always create more affidavits at anytime. Affidavits create ‘your’ law; law between the parties. So if you are not happy with their law, create your own. Yours are far more powerful in every single way if done correctly. Your affidavit can have one single point or hundreds; it is your document so you can make it whatever you want and for whatever suits your purpose.
Q. Why is a private affidavit so powerful?
A. Basically because as a private man/woman you can operate under unlimited commercial liability and public entities cannot. You see all public entities have what is called a ‘scope of office’ – which is basically a job description and conditions for which they have limited liability insurance cover. For instance, if a Police Officer believes that you are becoming threatening or aggressive he can make the decision to use appropriate force to restrict and arrest you. Now if in the tussle you fell and broke your arm, the Police Officer does not have to worry about prosecution because using appropriate force in this situation is in his ‘scope of office’ and therefore falls under his limited liability insurance policy. But, if the Police Officer was to punch you in the face whilst you were sat in your car, he can now be prosecuted for a criminal offence. If the prosecution stands then his insurance would not cover him in anyway. Therefore he could do jail time, be fined and lose his job as his actions did not fall under his insured ‘scope of office.’ EVERY public official, agent and employee has a ‘scope of office’ – that’s worth remembering!
In commerce, the game is won by the party who took the biggest risk, and as you sign under unlimited (full) commercial liability, the public entity cannot match that as they are under limited liability; unless they are willing to forego this and risk losing their own possessions and career; as far as I know no public entity has ever wanted to take that risk, understandably as they know they are involved in fiction. This is why it is also worthy of reiterating that you should only put your truth on an affidavit, because if it turns out that you have deliberately lied then you risk your commercial credibility for life; and anyway it is against EVERY law to use fraud/lies in your contracts, as so it should be, so DON’T do it! (I have listed some Maxims of law near the bottom of the page concerning affidavits so you can ascertain yourself why affidavits are seen as so powerful).
Q. Can the Respondent just return it?
A. Yes, but then they haven’t responded to the points raised so they are instantly at fault, so you can continue with the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure due to non response. Damned if they do and damned if they don’t springs to mind.
Q. Can the Respondent just respond with something like, “I disagree with point 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 17, and 21.”
A. Yes they can, but once again they would be at fault. A Maxim of Law states, “An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.” And any rebuttal must have evidence provided to the Affiant to demonstrate why the Affiant’s point isn’t true, and the Respondent needs to provide his/her rebuttal in sworn affidavit form. Now as long as you have your believed truth on the affidavit, they are NOT going to rebut your facts with their fiction, guaranteed!
The process is as follows:
1. Print out your affidavit on very high quality paper. I would recommend something like ‘Southworth’ Cotton paper, but if finances won’t allow then try and find the best quality you can afford because this affidavit will become a valuable document to you.
2. Visit a Notary Public to attend an ‘Affidavit Oath Swearing’ and make sure you take a valid passport and a current utility bill or bank statement as the Notary will require these for ID purposes. You will be in the Notaries office for no longer than about 30 minutes. (I also recommend that you buy a small ink pad so you can put your thumbprint seal next to your autograph for added validity and security, yet if you are uncomfortable with this then simply leave this part out). If you do not want to use a Notary then use two (2) private witnesses on the affidavit, Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure, but do get the Notice of Default Notarised. This is still very effective, saves money and you are still getting summary judgement; although with certain documents I would suggest getting the whole process Notarised if possible for the added weight and your own psychological confidence.
3. Photocopy the entire affidavit and then use the supplied ‘Certified Copy’ template to run the photocopied affidavit back through your printer whilst adding/printing the ‘Certified Copy’ details. (The Holder in due course of a document can lawfully make true, correct and complete copies of the originals; and the holder in due course in this instance is the Claimant/Affiant). NEVER SEND THE ORIGINALS – THEY ARE YOUR VALUABLE EVIDENCE THAT A LAWFUL AGREEMENT EXISTS! Sign and date the certified copies.
4. Post the copies using Special Delivery, and I would suggest within 48 hours of the Notaries verification. KEEP THE POSTAL RECEPTS SAFE WITH THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 14 + days time.
5. Prepare a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure, again using high quality paper, and continue the same process as above giving the Respondent the set amount of time to respond. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 7 + days time.
6. Prepare a Notice of Default and once again continue with the above process. Once you have a ‘default’ judgement from the Notary you now have a bona fide lawfully binding agreement/contract.
Now if you so wish, every time that you need to inform a ‘public’ entity that you have a lawful agreement with Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister (or whoever) then simply make another ‘Certified Copy’ and send it to them; the affidavit copy and the default copy. If they still dare to proceed (extremely unlikely), maybe subpoena the CEO of the UK, in this instance Gordon Brown… it would be a laugh and raise a few eyebrows hey! In truth once you have a valid and lawful agreement you shouldn’t even be going to court, that’s their little playhouse of fairytales, so let them keep it and take care of your business administratively on the private side.
I remember studying what is sometimes (erroneously in my opinion) called ‘Commercial Redemption’ under Winston Shrout and I would hear Winston say the following statement on many occasions, “If you don’t like their law, then create your own.” For months I didn’t grasp quite what he meant and Winston is a great teacher (spiritually as well as commercially), and so I believe he was waiting for folk to ‘have the ears to hear’ this particular loaded message, yet I received the light-bulb moment early whilst watching and studying Winston’s ‘Commercial Lien’ DVD (which I highly recommend). My often research buddy and friend, Guy, had the very same light bulb moment a few weeks later whilst watching the exact same DVD without any interaction between us regarding this matter, and so we knew we were on to something when we shared our individual experiences. Then Guy met with Winston at a private seminar and informed him of what we were currently doing and showed him our private material; Winston was suitably impressed and informed Guy that our method was absolutely rock solid and the correct and lawful procedure. To be truly honest we already sensed this but of course it is always a pleasure to receive confirmation from someone who has inspired your learning. Since then we have had this information confirmed time and time again, yet as stated before, we didn’t really need this confirmation as our confidence in this process felt very solid; and once you realise who you really are I am sure you will comprehend, or already do comprehend, what I am talking about.
Remember it is the agreement of the parties that is important. Their law is contract law, and theirs is built on fraud and deception, so create the contracts that you want, not what they want, and yours will be built on fact and truth. If they do not rebut or reply to your paperwork (they won’t) then you have a ‘lawfully binding’ agreement that no other party can lawfully or legally impair. By the way, if the respondent violates the contract then you have instant lien right, but that is for another day. My personal opinion is this; affidavits and maritime liens (which are affidavits of obligation from the private side) wipe the floor of everything in their laughable and weak fictional system.
Maxims of law. (Affidavit based)
An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
An un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.
An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.
(Research on Maxims with large sample listing)
If you don’t like the idea of creating and sending in such an elaborate affidavit as the one provided, and yet you have situations that would benefit from getting the other party into an agreement, then just a very few points can have an almighty effect. Example:
Affiant is a private living sentient man.
Affiant is not JOHN SMITH or any other artificial entity/legal fiction.
The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
The Affiant is not liable for JOHN SMITH or any artificial derivative thereof at anytime whatsoever.
The Affiant is not liable for any public debts/liabilities at any time whatsoever.
The Affiant is not a member of any society whatsoever and therefore the Affiant is not bound by any society’s statutes, rules or codes.
Now if the above six (6) points are your truths (and they should be) and you put them on an affidavit to the Respondent, the Respondent has to provide evidence to the contrary of all the 6 points if they want to rebut. I think you can see for yourself that they won’t be able to do that. I think you will also notice that you don’t even have to use the above 6 points; 1 would be enough for most cases, but try and think of any situation you are involved with that couldn’t be solved by having a lawfully binding agreement/contract such as the above.
Folks;
Stop messing around in fear, controversy, statutes, and other self limiting ways; many of the limiting ways I witness on this and many other forums. Create the law you want with the corporate entities. Once you realise who you are and why your true identity and power has been kept at bay, you will realise why a private sovereign affidavit is so powerful. Keep your original affidavits very safe and keep ‘certified copies’ on you at all times. An enforcement agent will only proceed so far after they have checked the validity of your paperwork; because you will have made sure of the following:
You know who and what you are.
You know what you are not.
You are working through your anger, resentment and blame issues.
You have stopped being a victim in life.
You are realising that only you have the power to make you feel.
You are working towards treating ALL others with understanding, patience, forgiveness, empathy and tolerance.
You offer your self in service to others at some points throughout your day/week.
Your law/agreement documents are correct.
Soon we can all be sending our law to ‘thingy me-jig’ d/b/a President of Europe. Oh what larks.
If you have any questions whatsoever please contact me and I will endeavour to provide you with an answer/opinion.
Warmest regards,
Matt.
Sample Templates
Hi Matt,
I am brand new and will be doing a lot of reading and research before doing anything, but your affidavit struck a chord with me in as far as who I am and what I am not. I do have some early questions though:
1) Are there peculiarities of Scottish law and notaries that affect this procedure?
2)You say “…men and women do not need permission to engage in any particular thing as long as it is not harming or injuring any other living soul in any way; and even then men and women don’t actually require ‘permission.’” How does this relate to the consumption of substances determined illegal by the government?
Thanks
Reading further I have understood that the POLICE POWERS OF ARREST AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT excluslively refers to ‘persons’ and ‘individuals’ and not ‘man’ or ‘woman’. The question then is that in practice, I will be arrested if I am sitting on my porch smoking a joint when a police officer walks by. What legal redress do I have then, have they acted outside the scope of their office?
Hi,
1. An affidavit is accepted throughout the world as a statement of truth, and if un-rebutted, then it is accepted as an agreement of the parties; if coming from the private side then it is accepted as private law, and therefore law that no other party can impair.
2. The consumption of illegal substances is simply that; illegal. So they only have legal jurisdiction over other legal personalities and artificial entities, i.e. citizens, persons, corporations, vessels, taxpayers, members of the public etc. A man or woman can consume any substance they like and commit no crime as long as it harms no other living soul. All drug related offences are merely corporate statutes and Acts, and therefore, have no authority over men or women unless through ignorance and/or fear the man or woman consents to their corporate authority.
Regards, Matt.
Hi Martin,
thank you for that, and I am glad you got it sorted. Regards, Matt.
I wish to make a contribution of ideas based on my experiences in the awakening to what is going on in the world of politics and commerce and how it affects us, with suggestions on how to deal with it in context of Matt’s original article.
Many of us are straddling two realities. Actually, I believe the realities are infinite, each of us with our own unique perspective of reality, but for the purposes of simplifying the idea, let’s boil it down to two paradigms. There is the reality that is forced upon all, often called “the system” and the majority of us learn how to exist in this paradigm to varying degrees. The other reality is the one that we want to create, the one that resonates with us. The awakening that is happening at the moment allows us to see both realities.
Many of us are transitioning between realities. We are aware of the old system and we are beginning to create our own reality in resonance with others; a reality of self responsibility and self governance.
It cannot be underestimated how internally challenging this transition is, which is further evidenced when we rouse the others and experience their emotional reactions. The challenge is purely internal. We don’t need to change the “external” world, we only need to hold what resonates within. Our makeup is such that it is very difficult to hold two opposing ideas and the same time. It takes time absorb our true “truth” and adjust the old truth that has been given to us all from birth. It may help to hold the perspective that we wouldn’t be able to facilitate the emergence of our own truth at this time without the catalyst of control and oppression, so don’t hate the reality that has been “given” to you, just see it as a necessary step to you allow you to become more self aware and ultimately breath your own truth of self responsibility.
Now, going back to the context, ie Matt’s article on this “tool” to aid the “transition”, many will come here reading this article, absorbing the knowledge within and all will come with their own unique perspectives based on where they are currently transitioning the two realities.
My first suggestion is: give yourself time. It takes time to absorb new knowledge and weed out old belief systems that you no longer need to hold on to, and which are in opposition to the new knowledge. Don’t rush into these processes. Play with them and the idea for a bit. Take Matt’s templates (and others) and re-write them making them your own. Write your own documents from scratch. Take time to understand all the elements of the documents and investigate any that you don’t. Look up the definitions of words you don’t know. Find other affidavits and documents and compare them to what you have. When you finally decide to release your affidavit onto the recipient, know everything about what you are sending and the subsequent process you will follow through with.
My second suggestion to aid with this transition is to make connections with others who are on a similar path to you and exchange ideas and questions. In my experience, this is far more effective in private than on public forums. Public posting is very important for getting ideas in front of us all, but private connections help us tread the path more easily. No one is alone unless they want to make that so.
Start slowly. Don’t try to bring your new reality to “theirs” overnight. Start with one or two things and learn from that experience before asserting your reality further.
Lawful Rebellion, commercial redemption, freeman on the land and other ideas all hold different frequencies. Give yourself time to understand the difference between them and finally go with what resonates with you. For example, even though this article is written on a site called “lawful rebellion”, know that the article is a “commercial remedy”. Remember that this is all experience so go with those experiences that resonate with you and discard the experiences that no longer hold the energy you enjoy. Don’t hold judgement on success and failure, just enjoy the ride.
Rob,
a great and wise piece my friend. I encourage all to read what Rob is saying here and I suggest that his advice about taking your time and making your affidavits and other paperwork really yours by understanding EXACTLY what it is saying and how and why the process works. I have witnessed many folk just send off paperwork without a true understanding and all it ends up doing is informing those in the know , just how little you know and therefore leaves you vulnerable.
Regards, Matt.
Hi Matt,
Great info here. I was wondering which process for tackling credit card companies you would advise? Would it be the same process outlined above? Also, would you carry on paying the payments before they were issued with a notice of default?
Any advice would be appreciated – I am seriously considering going down a route similar to this to tackle them and not just playing the old CCA1974 trick.
What happens to people in receipt of Sociual Security Benefits should they decide to withdraw their ‘Strawman’ status? Can such benefits be withdrawn?
Hi,
you can’t withdraw something that you never had. You see, men and women never had STRAWMAN status, and in fact I would recommend that you get the word status away from your idea of man or woman. The STRAWMAN is a legal fiction with a legal title that doesn’t belong to you, so it was never yours in the first place, so you are not withdrawing it. The affidavit, if you really study it, simply creates a lawfully binding agreement of the facts; you are not a legal fiction and therefore are not liable for any corporate rule attributed to the corporate STRAWMAN. The state would most probably dearly like to argue this with a deeper reality that we may not be aware of, yet they also risk letting too much out of the bag, and that might inlcude the seemingly very real possiblity that behind all this laughable legal system there exists “trusts” and more trusts! Another very interesting thing it does is inform the state that you are alive and well. Sounds strange but since the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, it would seem that the state may believe us to be dead (lost at sea) and therefore are holding our property in trust until we come back to claim it! Curiouser and curiouser hey! Regards, Matt.
Thanks Matt.
This information is mind blowing. I am a regular contributor to FMOTL site, which is how I came to be directed to this amazing site! Amazing…
Matt,
I have decided to use your excellent template to produce my own affidavit. Do I use my ‘middle name’ in addition throught the document and I thought that names in lower case related to a person, rather than an entity. Your template suggests that even names and derivatives of names in lower case are all artificial entities and legal fictions. Is this correct?
Apart from that, I feel that I completely understand the process. Are Notary Publics generally compliant with such an affidavit? Many thanks.
Matt
How does one find a Notary who will go along with this?
There you go my friend, visit here and find one in your area.
http://www.thenotariessociety.org.uk/
When you phone the Notary, be honest and say you want to make an appointment to perform a commercial oath swearing on a document that may have to go into a foreign jurisdiction. This is not about getting a notary to “go along with it” as this is a completely lawful and appropriate document. Regards, Matt.
Matt
Its reborn from TPUC. That’s a great article. I constantly see Affidavit talked about yet I did not get too much into this since John Harris went through the Freeman route (and he talks about Affidavit alot). Being in the Freeman of the land route would mean i can’t go abroad and being complete ‘out of system’ has it’s disadvantages. So reading this article has helped understand what it really is and how it could be used. I will learn more from you and others before sending them off.
Apart from what you have written here about Affidavit, is there any consequences of following through with this procedure?
I suppose i could use the Affidavit for income t*xes (our taxes are being use for many horrible things, Iraq and Afghan are two of them)
Hi,
Thanks for the support. Please take the time to read all the comments pages; I know it is a long (ish) process but it will contain the replies to many of the questions that may be whirling around your head. Regards my friend, Matt.
Hello I have read the Gordon Brown – Affidavit, and it is for the UK.
I live in Canada and I was wondering what Crown name(s) or Authority do I use in place of the UK. And do I send this to the Prime Minister of Canada?
Any others I need to send to??
Hi,
Stephen Harper , doing business as Prime Minister.
CANADA is a corporation and legal fiction operating in bankrupcty just like the UK. I am sure that you will find the need for more affidavits drafted to your spec as you progress through your unique journey my friend. Regards, Matt.
Hello Matt,
Can you explain more re: need for more affidavits drafted to your spec?
Thanks again,
Durwin
Or would you like my addy?
My understanding of this point is:
The Affiant is not liable for any public debts/liabilities at any time whatsoever.
Is: public debts meaning bank loans, car loans etc etc. I am not liable to pay back?? So in a way, I am debt free from the bank or where ever my debt is?
Durwin
Matt,
My Affidavit is prepared and I will be making an appointment with the appropriate Notary Public next week.
I still am unsure with regard to a possible conflict in the wording. Can you please advise?
In the early part of the Affidavit, it states that all instances of my name are all artificial entities and legal fictions.
Then, at the point in the document that I am about to sign, “I, a man commonly known as…” reference is made to the name outlined as an artificial entity and legal fiction.
My understanding is that emphasis is on the wording ‘commonly known as’. Is this correct? Therefore, there is no conflict?
A small matter, but how can I include the recorded delivery reference number in the Affidavit when I will not receive this until the document is ready for posting? Will reference to the fact that the Affidavit was sent recorded delivery suffice?
Many thanks!
I simply mean that once the power of affidavits from the man/woman dawn on you, you will hoefully realise the rationale for using them within your own unique context of situations and scenarios that you may find yourself in whilst dealing with the laughable legal system! Regards, Matt.
Hi Durwin,
Ok, it is impossible to “pay” a debt in the UK, as since the 1930’s when most of the so-called countries (corporations) agreed to go into bankruptcy and to remove substance backed money, it became impossible to fulfil a contract by payment, so that was the end of common law in that particular respect; so all that can be done is to discharge that debt into the future. Look at all bank notes and what does it say? “PROMISE to pay the bearer…” It’s merely a promise to pay on a future date, and the future date is when the state bring back substance backed money; can’t see that happening for a while! When the UK went bankrupt they took the liabilities for public debt, and look on any public documents and you won’t see your name, you will see an artificial entity that belongs to the state, so who is liable? Not you!
By the way, it would appear the reason they construe you are liable is because they imply you are the trustee of the account and they are the beneficiary of the “trust,” i.e. bank account. And because we haven’t expressed the trust (proved its existence) we are ignorant to their game; but that is changing! Start studying the article on trusts on this site and see what jumps out! Regards, Matt.
Thanks Matt,
I know I should AND WILL study more on it, I’m just worried that if I dont pay, they get the collections and all the other people involved to make me pay,…I guess its normal to feel this was since thats how we all have been raised up but our parents and the so called Law.
Another question, If I do up a Affidavit stating:
The Affiant’s use of any drug and or alcohol substance is allowed anywhere inside or outside, if it does not and will not do any harm to another human.
This should be alright eh?
Thanks again,
Durwin
Durwin,
there is no need to even mention drugs/substances. Look at this statement on the affidavit:
• The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
ALL drug laws are merely statutes (Acts), so if the affiant is not liable to or for any statutes , rules and/or codes then he is NOT liable to or for any drug ones hey! Regards, Matt.
Hey Matt,
True enough, hey Matt, you wanna smoke a joint on Parliment Hill?? LOL LOL
Durwin
Hi Matt,
Affidavit printed off ready for Public Notary next week. Can you please confirm if I have the timings correct? I allow Gordon Brow 14 days to respond to initial Affidavit. After 14 days, I then attend the Public Notary to have the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure notarised and delivered. After a further 7 days, I once again attend the office of the Public Notary to have the Notice of Default notarised, which constitutes a default judgement, a bona fide lawfully binding agreement/contract. Job done!
Or is it 7 days for response, with a further 7 days for Notice of fault and Opportunity to Cure? Your advice would be much appreciated! Ready to go!!!
Hi,
this reply is acting in responsibilty my friend. Please re-read the affidavit process and affidavit, notice of fault and opportunity to cure and notice of default again and you will see all the info that I suggest on there. Please remember that this is your “private” document , so therefore you create the terms and conditions and you can put whatever dates and timelengths on you want. By re-reading all the information again you may take on board something that you missed; this happens to me often. I normally create a document and then go back to it over the next couple of days and it is surprising what jumps out at you. Regards, Matt.
Thanks Matt,
I will, of course, re-read the documents as advised.
It might just well be that I am missing something and I am in no way attempting to detract from all of your hard work. Your information and advice is, I feel, about to have a major impact upon my life. Thank you!I can’t wait to have it all sorted!!!!!!
I have read this with interest, and must say I agree very much with the idea of taking your time and get to understand the different options.
I have just started to listen to the “Living Temple” series at
http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/
and must say I very much like the idea put accross there.
I really recommend visiting this site and downloading their materials as well as joining the Google Group, for daily updates.
To be a Creditor in Commerce, one does not argue or fight, one just knows who he is and how the game is played, and uses the remedies that are in the Public/Commerce/Admirality system. One acts responsibly and in honour at all times and find solutions within their system that everyone is happy with – solutions that leaves something for everyone.
If one does that there is no need to fight and threaten with liens etc.
Having said that, as much as I like to apply this I am at the moment more doing the fighting, for the simple reason that I do not know the UK remedies and how to do the filings etc. taught at “Creditors in Commerce”
so I am sending Notices and Affidavits in an effort to get a solution that is acceptable to me.
Since pretty much the whole world operates in Commerce, I am sure there are these remedies in all countries, but the names of the processes, forms etc. will vary with different countries and languages. Does anyone know if there is work being done in the UK on how to offset public debt, file papers with the Inland Revenue or the Treasury that gives access to some of the funds we, the living men/women, create for the system?
I believe the standard time that a lot use for initial presentments is 10 days based on the old adage of 3 days to arrive, 3 days to reply, 3 days to send reply, and a sunday.
Others use 7 days which is probably reasonable these days as usually the post arrives next day.
Some use 14, 21 or 30 days. I would set the time based on when you think a reasonable reply can be made based on the content/length of your document. But you can also build in a clause into your document to allow further reasonable time if necessary, if it is requested in writing.
For an opportunity to cure, most peeps usually give 3 or 7 days from what i’ve seen, but you could offer longer if you want.
I think it’s generally accepted that 3 days is minimum and when i do that, i don’t include weekend days and i count from the day the other side receive it.
Bare in mind xmas is coming up and there’s a bunch of bank holidays in there, so be reasonable. If i were sending the initial presentment tomorrow id give minimum 14 days to get past the “messy period”! :p
Hope that helps some 😉
Thanks Rob,
Very informative! I intend to have my affidavit signed this week and, taking into the Christmas break, will allow 14 days!
Hello, I have a question and it is not about Affidavit’s.
I am in CANADA and our “paper money” says “this note is legal tender” If I am correct it to is not REAL money right?
Thanks
Durwin
Hi Durwin,
to assist you in this, please give your answer to what is money? Armed with your answer for that you will be able to work out, in your opinion, if Canadian legal tender is real money or not. Regards, Matt.
Hi KentB,
I too have gained a lot of perspective from the CIC presentations and recommend them. Audio free to download from their site. Many many hours. Great stuff.
I think it’s fair to say that over here people are beginning to find their feet, what works, what isn’t. And of course, nothing is guaranteed. I personally see this as a great year for freedom and have no doubt that next year will bring further enlightment and juicy stuff.
With regard to your final paragraph, I assume you are refering to A4V and 1099OID. I am yet to hear of any evidence of success over here with either of them. I’m sure some have had success with A4V…but it’s really tricky as some companies simply back down in another way leaving you wondering if they did manage the setoff and ledger it or just decided to discharge it.
1099OID, whilst I believe is possible over here through private administrative remedy, I think it will be tricky and certainly far easier if you have a rottweiler organsation (IRS) to pursue your claim. The Standing in Commerce guys held a 1099OID seminar in this country around a year ago, but I still haven’t heard any evidence of any success with 1099OID with those holding the seminar or those attending. I don’t think they have held subsequent seminars so my assumption is that it remains uncracked. Happy solstice!
I contacted one of my local Notary Public’s yesterday to make an appointment. He quickly responded by email requesting further information for more details. Fair enough. My response is copied below, and I am a little worried that he has not yet responded!Any advice?
I wish for you to oversee a commercial oath swearing on a document that may have to go into a foreign jurisdiction
I intend to create a private Affidavit to send to Mr. Gordon Brown, Prime Minister.
His law is contract law, and is built on fraud and deception, so I have created a contract that I want, built on fact and truth. Should Mr. Brown decide not to rebut or reply to my Affidavit, then I have a ‘lawfully binding’ agreement that no other party can lawfully or legally impair.
I do believe that this is a completely lawful and appropriate document. If Mr. Brown violates this contract then I have instant lien right.
My Affidavit is prepared, and ready to be signed by a Notary Public. I wish for this to happen this week. Can you please advise of your availability?
Hey syntaxian,
My thought is that it sounds a little confrontational and maybe a bit too much information?
How about…I need a notary to varify my signature on a private document that may be used in another jurisdiction…with the aim of gaining agreement between the parties?
Hi syntaxian,
I suggest you have given the Notary way too much information and I agree with Rob; it sounds confrontational. You are already making statements and telling the Notary what you believe Gordon Browns law is and that he is committing fraud, and you mention that you wish to place a lien on him if he doesn’t reply. My friend, your frustration is causing you to say too much and make foolish mistakes. If I was the Notary I would say no and forward the email to other Notaries in the area to warn them of your intentions. I encourage you to learn from this and move forward.
I normally say, “I have a 3 page (or whatever it is) private document that may be required in a foreign jurisdiction, so therefore request your services as a Notary to verify my signature. I would provide a current passport and a utility bill for identification purposes. Please inform me as to the cost and your availability.”
Regards, Matt.
Hello for the Affidavit, I have read that we are to use high quality paper,
are we to use the standard size 8 by 11, or the longer one 8 by 14 (or whatever that size is??
Durwin
Damn!
I accept your advice that the correspondence may have been too confrontational and can only hope that other Notaries in the area are not being forewarned.
However, what then happens when I actually visit a Notary in person and present the document? What if he/she decides on the spot that the Affidavit is too confrontational/controversial? Can they refuse to Notarise?
Hello,
Question….
I have children, would it be wise to also have them right up an affidavit? Or should I let them do it when they are much older and they understand this whole process?
My answer to this is to wait until they are old enough..But I am just looking for your opinion on this.
Thanks
Durwin
Hey syntaxian, when u go to notary, just be calm and confident. Chat to them and make them feel comfortable. If they ask a lot of questions, just politely as possible say that ur not seeking legal advice. They may ask a few questions to ascertain that you are the author of the document. I guess there is a chance the notary may accept on the phone/by email and then withdraw in person. If you are happy that your affidavit is respectful and honourable, then s/he shouldn’t see controntation in it.
Thank you Rob. I will keep you informed of my progress……..
Have you been through this process yourself?
I am in the process of reading The Antiterrorist Handbook, purchased from his web site. Quite a fascinating read!!!
Hi – yes I have. I’ve spoken to a couple of notaries, one oblidging, one difficult…so i appreciate it can be hit or miss.
I’m looking forward to unwrapping the AT book in a couple of days!
Take care
Hello,
I have the bank calling me everyday for 2 missed car loan payments, any suggestions on what I can do?
Thanks
Durwin
HI,
Should the original not stay with the Notary, and should the respondent not be writing back to the Notary address? otherwise how does the Notary know that you did not receive a response, or are we just assuming the respondent cant rebut this? THANKS
Hi Iain,
Remember that as a man you are capable of telling the truth and stating the facts, and swearing on oath to this under unlimited liabilty; your word should be your bond. So if you say you didn’t receive a response, then you didn’t. Also if your affidavit contains your truth then it will be unrebuttable, especially by any entity that is working for the “public” sector and under limited liabilty insurance. Regards, Matt.
Well I can’t give advice, but if it were me I would…
1) Set up a separate ring tone for the bank, then don’t answer those calls
2) Inform them of your standing via affidavit
3) Invite them to write to you with a charge of your choosing for all responses you make
4) Wish them a merry christmas
@Iain: I believe it is worth asking the notary if they mind their office being the location for response and thus witnessing the non response (which is pretty much always going to happen). The final notice of non-response can be adjusted to reflect this giving more strength to the process, imho. Whether the process requires this extra strength, I don’t have the experience to comment, but in theory extra strenth should be gained by the notary acting as witness to the response/non response as well well as verifying your signature. Of course there is no one right (or wrong) way to do this. If we are drawn to this stuff, we will no doubt “enjoy” new experiences whatever we do, forever learning along the way.
Matt, I am blown away mate. Thanks for everything. Would like to chat with you regarding affidavits on trusts. God bless!, Dom