Creating Sovereign Law – Practice and Procedure
Article and sample documents courtesy of Matt
Affidavit process
It troubles me to see so many messing around with PCNs, debt collectors, statutes etc. The affidavit process below is to hopefully give you an option to free you from all that.
Q. Would you like a lawfully binding way to stop messing around with arguing FIXED PENALTY CHARGES, debt collectors, council tax, utility companies, TV licensing etc? A way that creates the lawfully binding and irrefutable void between you and the legal ‘person’ and can demonstrate to all parties that you as a man/woman are not lawfully liable for any public entity or public debt/liability; as well as any other FACTS that you may want to use for a particular purpose?
I am guessing the answer is yes. Then Affidavits, I believe, are your way forward.
A ‘private’ affidavit, if the whole process is done correctly, creates a ‘lawfully’ binding agreement/contract between the parties that rises far, far above any ‘legal’ contract/agreement; in fact as paperwork goes, an affidavit from the ‘private’ side is superior to all other documents, full stop! You could go as far as to term the private un-rebutted affidavit as ‘Sovereign Law’ because an affidavit from the private side and sworn under unlimited commercial liability indicates that a sentient living private man/woman is behind it, and therefore a Sovereign. (Warning – Please make sure that whatever you put on an affidavit is your truth).
I have attached an affidavit for you to peruse and use if you wish. I have actually used this affidavit in a slightly longer format, yet I have removed a few points that I used as they may have been confusing to some, yet as you will see the points on the attached affidavit create an agreement (law of the parties) that would cover, I believe, every eventuality between the private (real) and public (fiction). If you cannot stand-under any of the points on the attached affidavit then remove them or research them until you are convinced without a shadow-of-doubt that they are now your truth.
Do NOT use affidavits lightly. Research what you are doing if you are unsure. Affidavits are simple and incredibly powerful law documents. There is nothing to be fearful of whilst using them, but please comprehend what you are doing before firing them off!
Q. How does this affidavit create an agreement of the parties?
A. Because of Tacit Procuration and Stare Decisis (see below for more on stare decisis). Tacit Procuration basically means ‘silent agreement’ (agreement through acquiescence) and this is the reason why ignoring documents is considered a lethal act in Admiralty Law. If the Respondent does not respond then he/she is simply saying, “Yes I agree/affirm by my acquiescence.” Tacit procuration enables what is commonly known as ‘self authenticating contracts.’
Q. Why use a Notary Public?
A. The reason Notary Public verification on important documents is so powerful is because simply, in effect, by the time you have a Notice of Default signed and sealed by a Notary you have ‘lawful’ summary judgement which cannot be overturned, as long as your paperwork and process is correct. (By the way, if at a later date you discover your paperwork is lacking in some way, then simply create another one with all the corrections on. Remember, every party has to have the ability to exhaust their administrative remedies, and creating an affidavit is part of that process). Quite simply you now have ‘STARE DECISIS’ – Lat; “to stand by that which is decided.” The principal that the precedent decisions are to be followed by the courts; and you also have ‘RES JUDICATA’ – Lat; decided or determined by judicial power; a thing judicially decided; a judgement that is considered final and bars re-litigation on the same matter. A Notary is the judicial power! Also important is the fact that a Notary can act as a conduit between the private and public in regards to ‘foreign’ jurisdiction; a solicitor cannot do this. Private is classed as foreign to the public.
One of the great deceptions of official agencies is the use of the Stare Decisis doctrine. Stare Decisis originates from Common Law courts and it is in Common Law that the principles of precedent decisions exist. Precedent decisions do not have to be used in Admiralty courts: http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Admiralty
So an official agency sends another party a document. The document gets ignored (lethal in Admiralty), and so the agency sends out a follow up of some kind. If the document gets ignored again then the Common Law doctrine of ‘Stare Decisis’ gives the official agency summary judgement; the case is now already decided and cannot be argued.
Q. What is a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and why do I need to use one?
A. A Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure is correct procedure and therefore gives the Affiant uncompromised standing. There may be a very genuine reason why the Respondent couldn’t respond; maybe a death in the family, maybe they were hospitalized etc. So you are saying, “just in case there is a genuine reason why you couldn’t respond I am kindly granting you a further three (3) days to respond. You are being nice, and so you should be, as you want to stay honourable at ALL times.
Q. Do I have to put all the points on my affidavit?
A. No of course not. Make sure it is your truth and besides you can always create more affidavits at anytime. Affidavits create ‘your’ law; law between the parties. So if you are not happy with their law, create your own. Yours are far more powerful in every single way if done correctly. Your affidavit can have one single point or hundreds; it is your document so you can make it whatever you want and for whatever suits your purpose.
Q. Why is a private affidavit so powerful?
A. Basically because as a private man/woman you can operate under unlimited commercial liability and public entities cannot. You see all public entities have what is called a ‘scope of office’ – which is basically a job description and conditions for which they have limited liability insurance cover. For instance, if a Police Officer believes that you are becoming threatening or aggressive he can make the decision to use appropriate force to restrict and arrest you. Now if in the tussle you fell and broke your arm, the Police Officer does not have to worry about prosecution because using appropriate force in this situation is in his ‘scope of office’ and therefore falls under his limited liability insurance policy. But, if the Police Officer was to punch you in the face whilst you were sat in your car, he can now be prosecuted for a criminal offence. If the prosecution stands then his insurance would not cover him in anyway. Therefore he could do jail time, be fined and lose his job as his actions did not fall under his insured ‘scope of office.’ EVERY public official, agent and employee has a ‘scope of office’ – that’s worth remembering!
In commerce, the game is won by the party who took the biggest risk, and as you sign under unlimited (full) commercial liability, the public entity cannot match that as they are under limited liability; unless they are willing to forego this and risk losing their own possessions and career; as far as I know no public entity has ever wanted to take that risk, understandably as they know they are involved in fiction. This is why it is also worthy of reiterating that you should only put your truth on an affidavit, because if it turns out that you have deliberately lied then you risk your commercial credibility for life; and anyway it is against EVERY law to use fraud/lies in your contracts, as so it should be, so DON’T do it! (I have listed some Maxims of law near the bottom of the page concerning affidavits so you can ascertain yourself why affidavits are seen as so powerful).
Q. Can the Respondent just return it?
A. Yes, but then they haven’t responded to the points raised so they are instantly at fault, so you can continue with the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure due to non response. Damned if they do and damned if they don’t springs to mind.
Q. Can the Respondent just respond with something like, “I disagree with point 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 17, and 21.”
A. Yes they can, but once again they would be at fault. A Maxim of Law states, “An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.” And any rebuttal must have evidence provided to the Affiant to demonstrate why the Affiant’s point isn’t true, and the Respondent needs to provide his/her rebuttal in sworn affidavit form. Now as long as you have your believed truth on the affidavit, they are NOT going to rebut your facts with their fiction, guaranteed!
The process is as follows:
1. Print out your affidavit on very high quality paper. I would recommend something like ‘Southworth’ Cotton paper, but if finances won’t allow then try and find the best quality you can afford because this affidavit will become a valuable document to you.
2. Visit a Notary Public to attend an ‘Affidavit Oath Swearing’ and make sure you take a valid passport and a current utility bill or bank statement as the Notary will require these for ID purposes. You will be in the Notaries office for no longer than about 30 minutes. (I also recommend that you buy a small ink pad so you can put your thumbprint seal next to your autograph for added validity and security, yet if you are uncomfortable with this then simply leave this part out). If you do not want to use a Notary then use two (2) private witnesses on the affidavit, Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure, but do get the Notice of Default Notarised. This is still very effective, saves money and you are still getting summary judgement; although with certain documents I would suggest getting the whole process Notarised if possible for the added weight and your own psychological confidence.
3. Photocopy the entire affidavit and then use the supplied ‘Certified Copy’ template to run the photocopied affidavit back through your printer whilst adding/printing the ‘Certified Copy’ details. (The Holder in due course of a document can lawfully make true, correct and complete copies of the originals; and the holder in due course in this instance is the Claimant/Affiant). NEVER SEND THE ORIGINALS – THEY ARE YOUR VALUABLE EVIDENCE THAT A LAWFUL AGREEMENT EXISTS! Sign and date the certified copies.
4. Post the copies using Special Delivery, and I would suggest within 48 hours of the Notaries verification. KEEP THE POSTAL RECEPTS SAFE WITH THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 14 + days time.
5. Prepare a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure, again using high quality paper, and continue the same process as above giving the Respondent the set amount of time to respond. Then make another appointment with the Notary for another ‘Oath Swearing’ in 7 + days time.
6. Prepare a Notice of Default and once again continue with the above process. Once you have a ‘default’ judgement from the Notary you now have a bona fide lawfully binding agreement/contract.
Now if you so wish, every time that you need to inform a ‘public’ entity that you have a lawful agreement with Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister (or whoever) then simply make another ‘Certified Copy’ and send it to them; the affidavit copy and the default copy. If they still dare to proceed (extremely unlikely), maybe subpoena the CEO of the UK, in this instance Gordon Brown… it would be a laugh and raise a few eyebrows hey! In truth once you have a valid and lawful agreement you shouldn’t even be going to court, that’s their little playhouse of fairytales, so let them keep it and take care of your business administratively on the private side.
I remember studying what is sometimes (erroneously in my opinion) called ‘Commercial Redemption’ under Winston Shrout and I would hear Winston say the following statement on many occasions, “If you don’t like their law, then create your own.” For months I didn’t grasp quite what he meant and Winston is a great teacher (spiritually as well as commercially), and so I believe he was waiting for folk to ‘have the ears to hear’ this particular loaded message, yet I received the light-bulb moment early whilst watching and studying Winston’s ‘Commercial Lien’ DVD (which I highly recommend). My often research buddy and friend, Guy, had the very same light bulb moment a few weeks later whilst watching the exact same DVD without any interaction between us regarding this matter, and so we knew we were on to something when we shared our individual experiences. Then Guy met with Winston at a private seminar and informed him of what we were currently doing and showed him our private material; Winston was suitably impressed and informed Guy that our method was absolutely rock solid and the correct and lawful procedure. To be truly honest we already sensed this but of course it is always a pleasure to receive confirmation from someone who has inspired your learning. Since then we have had this information confirmed time and time again, yet as stated before, we didn’t really need this confirmation as our confidence in this process felt very solid; and once you realise who you really are I am sure you will comprehend, or already do comprehend, what I am talking about.
Remember it is the agreement of the parties that is important. Their law is contract law, and theirs is built on fraud and deception, so create the contracts that you want, not what they want, and yours will be built on fact and truth. If they do not rebut or reply to your paperwork (they won’t) then you have a ‘lawfully binding’ agreement that no other party can lawfully or legally impair. By the way, if the respondent violates the contract then you have instant lien right, but that is for another day. My personal opinion is this; affidavits and maritime liens (which are affidavits of obligation from the private side) wipe the floor of everything in their laughable and weak fictional system.
Maxims of law. (Affidavit based)
An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
An un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.
An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.
(Research on Maxims with large sample listing)
If you don’t like the idea of creating and sending in such an elaborate affidavit as the one provided, and yet you have situations that would benefit from getting the other party into an agreement, then just a very few points can have an almighty effect. Example:
Affiant is a private living sentient man.
Affiant is not JOHN SMITH or any other artificial entity/legal fiction.
The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
The Affiant is not liable for JOHN SMITH or any artificial derivative thereof at anytime whatsoever.
The Affiant is not liable for any public debts/liabilities at any time whatsoever.
The Affiant is not a member of any society whatsoever and therefore the Affiant is not bound by any society’s statutes, rules or codes.
Now if the above six (6) points are your truths (and they should be) and you put them on an affidavit to the Respondent, the Respondent has to provide evidence to the contrary of all the 6 points if they want to rebut. I think you can see for yourself that they won’t be able to do that. I think you will also notice that you don’t even have to use the above 6 points; 1 would be enough for most cases, but try and think of any situation you are involved with that couldn’t be solved by having a lawfully binding agreement/contract such as the above.
Folks;
Stop messing around in fear, controversy, statutes, and other self limiting ways; many of the limiting ways I witness on this and many other forums. Create the law you want with the corporate entities. Once you realise who you are and why your true identity and power has been kept at bay, you will realise why a private sovereign affidavit is so powerful. Keep your original affidavits very safe and keep ‘certified copies’ on you at all times. An enforcement agent will only proceed so far after they have checked the validity of your paperwork; because you will have made sure of the following:
You know who and what you are.
You know what you are not.
You are working through your anger, resentment and blame issues.
You have stopped being a victim in life.
You are realising that only you have the power to make you feel.
You are working towards treating ALL others with understanding, patience, forgiveness, empathy and tolerance.
You offer your self in service to others at some points throughout your day/week.
Your law/agreement documents are correct.
Soon we can all be sending our law to ‘thingy me-jig’ d/b/a President of Europe. Oh what larks.
If you have any questions whatsoever please contact me and I will endeavour to provide you with an answer/opinion.
Warmest regards,
Matt.
Sample Templates
thanks matt! this is really the way forward and really helpful. ;p
Hi Matt thanks for the information…. I have one question can I send an affidavit to the Chief Constable? And how much does a NOTARY PUBLIC cost?
Cheers 🙂
thanks matt i don’t fully understand all this stuff but you know when something is right lets sink all there shipping laws
Thanks Matt – A nicely written article.
Any stories of using this private agreement to settle a public matter?
Why did you choose Gordon Brown as a respondent? Wouldn’t you need to send your affidavit to all interested parties (eg. banks, city council etc)?
Anyways, keep it up!
Cheers
Hi Matt
Just stumbled upon your article and I am keen to know how I can apply what you have stated to address my current circumstance. In a nutshell, I had a business collapse and a bereavement which led mounting debts that went unanswered. I am now returning to employment and was preparing to address all the creditors on their terms and seek payment plans when I saw your article.
I have re-read your article a couple of times, and I am wondering how I could apply the processes you speak of practically to a range of creditors including PCN`s, local council, bailiffs, utility companies and suppliers related to my previous business as a sole trader.
I must admit I have had a bit of difficulty following it and would greatly appreciate any other format you may have that lays out the processes step by step ( any diagrams /flowcharts per chance ? – my learning style works well with Mindmaps/flowcharts diagrams but pages of text prove quite difficult!
I feel i need to `internalise` the processes if that makes sense and dont want to go into this unprepared.
I don`t know if a chat is possible but if not, I would be grateful to hear of any advice you could pass on in dealing with assorted officialdom and private companies.
I will pass your website on to my friends and commend you on this public spirited work.
Best.
Nile 07896 276539
For this particular Affidavit it works. Gordon Brown d/b/a Prime Minister is the CEO of the UNITED KINGDOM and so the CEO has the ability to bind the UK in an agreement. As all public entities within the UK must adhere to the statutes and codes legislated by the UK Government, it is prudent to have an agreement with the ‘publics’ ultimate ‘public’ boss. Are they really going to override him to violate their own fictional rules with their own fictional lies?
A Maxim of law is, “Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent,” so theoretically there is no need to notice any agent under the UK’s boss, and also it is a ‘private’ agreement so there is no obligation to make it public by Notice. But, if you want to Notice any party then just send them a true, correct and complete copy of the original.
Hope this helps, if not get back to me. Warmest regards, Matt.
Hi,
I haven’t got it flow charted as of yet and so I would suggest to assist your way of learning that you go through the article again and flow chart it yourself, and then feel free to email me and send me your flowchart and I would willingly give you my opinion my friend.
Check out the posted question next to yours as some of the reply given may help you.
What may interest you is that within the UNITED KINGDOM it is impossible to “pay” a debt, as there is no money, just fiat/promise to pay currency; the debt can never be “paid” until money (gold/silver) returns to give the money substance. Go through the Affidavit again and pick out the ones that you think may apply to your situation. Imagine an affidavit point that states: “Within the UK it is impossible to “pay” a debt.” Now they have to prove otherwise, which they won’t because they cannot.
I urge you to read and absorb as much as you can from the article and through the Affidavit itself, really study each point and see what it is saying. Then get back to me and we can take it from there. Regards, Matt.
Hi Rob,
I think I know you! If I am correct I still have a certain DVD set of yours!
There has now been 7 different debt collecting agencies and two council legal departments that have dropped all claims as soon as they received copies of this paperwork. I will have more news very soon though as certain things are going through as I type. For some reason the ‘public’ entities don’t seem to write back congratulating you! Warmest regards, Matt.
You can send one to whoever you may be in controversy with or who you believe may be injuring you in some way, so that’s pretty much the UK! Always find the name of the man/woman you are writing to and address them as i.e. John Smith, d/b/a Chief Constable of Norfolk Police Authority (or whoever).
Notaries vary greatly in cost. When you phone just inform them that you wish to perform an ‘oath swearing’ on a private affidavit. Try phoning a few and check out their prices. I pay between £15-20 per swearing but many charge much more. Regards, Matt.
listen guys, you’re still doing the ‘scared’ thing!
once done, it is done… YOU ARE FREE!
stop worrying about, ‘is it this, or is it that’,… it’s done!!!!
YES they will have to accept their own things against them, coz it is their own legal system. they can’t change it… they just didn’t think anyone would get the drift!!!
but… YOU HAVE!!! …chill out and stand up for your rights!!!!
Peace
Hi Matt,
Just a quick question on receiving a payment request from a government body, like for example council tax, how should I reply, I have read somewhere on TPUC, that I should reply with copies of affidavits sent to G Brown & to also use my NHS / account number & something about writing diagonally (bottom left to top right) PAID IN FULL Can you please clarify / point me towards more info on this, thanks….
This step by step guide is really useful. Well done and thanks.
I have a question about the consequences of following your procedure:
If you opt out of government rule do you forfeit your rights to public services such as health, education and welfare?
I think this could be a big issue for many people who are considering taking this route so some clarification would be very good.
Hi,
I have to be very careful when giving replies to questions like this, as it is obvious that you only have a little information about a few processes, and this I see as a main problem on many forums, but keep on studying the processes that ‘feel’ interesting to you and you will follow your own journey of discovery.
The diagonal writing that you are referring to is a lawful and correct method known as ‘Accepted for Value,’ yet as you are not fully aware of this process I would recommend that you do NOT use it yet. Please remember that YOU do NOT have a NHS or NI account number; it is owned by the state, fortunately, as that makes the state liable for all debts/liabilities attributed to it.
Read through the Affidavit process and the Affidavit itself again, study what the process gives you as well as studying what standing the Affidavit is giving you, and then knowing what to do with something like a council tax offer becomes a lot clearer. Try and write an Affidavit yourself and change some of the words maybe so you know what you are actually saying in your paperwork, it is the best and quickest way to become confident.
I am trying to be responsible with this answer as, in my opinion; you need to brush up on a few things. Feel free to contact me again after you have spent some time on this.
The easy answer in no, there is nothing to worry about regarding your concerns, but a fuller answer is:
You are not opting out of anything that you had in the first place. You never were under Government rule; you just thought you were so went along with it. The only thing that can be under Government/corporate (legal – artificial) rule is legal/artificial entities. Men and women do not have rights granted to them by Government, for this type of right is simply a legal claim, and men and women are not catered for in the legal world. Legally you have no rights! Legal rights belong to the ‘Citizens’ which are members of the ‘Body Politic,’ is that you? No, of course it is not. The ‘body politic’ is a legal fiction as is a ‘citizen.’
Men and women have what is termed as ‘unalienable rights’ and this refers to our entire God (Universe – Nature) given rights, and these cannot be impaired by any other man/woman, let alone any legal system built upon fraud and falsehoods.
Again I suggest that you really start to realise who and what you are, and what you are not. Hope this helps, Matt.
Matt,
Thanks for this mate, This is just what us newbees need. As you well know the flow of information and the ramifications of that information can be overwhelming when you first embark(sic) on this course.
This information is a goldmine and I can only thank you for clearing a path for us.
Outstanding work.
Peace to you all.
Dig
This is really good stuff guys!!
My unconditional love and support to you all for being true loving humans and standing up when you could of quite easily stayed sitting.
This has changed my life and everyones around me,THANK YOU!!
Andy from the clan of Pope!
Many thanks and appreciate your comments. Regards, Matt.
Thank you, all comments are welcome and your support is appreciated. Regards, Matt.
Hi Matt, Yes, well guessed! Don’t worry too much about the DVD set, but would like to catch up with you some time. I don’t suppose ur going to the freeman redemption conference in Nottingham tomorrow?
Cheers
Rob
Thanks for putting this info together.
Is lawful rebellion recognised by the EU, post-Lisbon?
Hi,
I think it is important to realise that ‘Lawful Rebellion’ isn’t for the ‘public’ and fictional legal world to recognise, it is for the men and women who wish to enter a particular psychological, energetic and behavioural state. Men and women do not need permission from a ‘de facto’ Government or a representational Monarch to do anything, and men and women do not need permission to engage in any particular thing as long as it is not harming or injuring any other living soul in any way; and even then men and women don’t actually require ‘permission.’ So there is no relevance as to whether any ‘public’ entity recognises Lawful Rebellion; they are fictional and have zero jurisdictions over any man or woman.
If any man or woman wishes to give a ‘public’ entity Notice of their particular stance then that is their choice, but it in not required. Lawful Rebellion is just two words and a man or woman can inform any other entity that they are in Lawful Rebellion at any time, either by document or verbally, and at that point it becomes a reality because a man or woman stated it. My word is my bond and oath.
Maybe you are still having a little difficulty knowing who and what you are and what you are not, and this would lead to anxiety and fear regarding the laughable and fictional political and legal world. You have the power as soon as you remember that you are a real sentient man or woman and the ‘public’ is just a fairytale. In a spiritual sense, the world of commerce and legality is NOT God’s work, it is satan’s work. Although interestingly, when you translate the word ‘satan’ from 6000 year old sanskrit tablets, you get the word ‘ego,’ so therefore it is the darker aspects of oursleves who created it…. mmmmm, so that means it is ultimately our responsibility.
Warmest regards,
Matt.
Has anyone considered adding a fee schedule to this?
There is nothing stopping you adding a fee schedule but if you did I would recommend that you call the document ‘Notice of Commercial Claim’ rather than affidvait. I am hoping to write a piece on these documents soon, as these type of contracts are widely used by such corporations as banks especially, in regards to mortgages where unbeknown to the man/woman a mortgage contract is actually two contracts in one; the top one is called a ‘simple contract’ which states something like, “I agree to pay a certain sum on the 1st of the month for the next 25 years.” But the man/woman are also signing an underlying contract which gives the bonding company (who purchased the contract from the bank) confessional judgement from the man/woman that they will hand all rights over to the bank/bonding company if they default.
Notice of Commercial Claim basically contains a sworn statement of facts, and then an accounting/true bill section. If the Respondent doesn’t re-but the sworn statement and goes into default, then the Respondent is in default of the whole contract including the accounting section.
Obviously the chances of anyone seeing any promissory notes (debt instruments) or credit (debt) regarding a fee schedule are almost none existent, yet what this document does brilliantly well is give you a lien right as soon as the agreement is breached; and it will probably be breached! And a lien is the only valid conterclaim in court. A Maritime lien (Commercial Lien/Affidavit of Obligation) from the private side is the highest form of lien. Hope this helps. Regards, Matt.
Hey Matt – a couple of questions
1. Many peeps have sent a similar-ish affidavits in the form of a NUICOR to the queen in her private capacity with basically the same contract – ie declaring a right to self government and not to be compelled by statute. What do you you see as the difference between sending to liz and to gordon?
2. This is the first time i’ve seen a 3 step process where the opp to cure is notarised. Any reason you adopted this?
3. I also notice that you haven’t used the notary as a witness to the non response by directing gordon’s response to the address of the notary. I’m assuming therefore that for the final notice of default the notary is witnessing your declaration that no response has been made and not actually witnessing the process. Do you think the process would be tighter/stronger if the notary is actually a witness to it?
Hi Rob,
Replies to your questions:
1. A NUICOR is not the same as an affidavit, and in my opinion, men and women do not have to claim any rights from anyone. An affidavit is stating the facts/truth, simply telling it how it is. If you look at the affidavit again you will notice that no where does it mention “lawful rebellion,” “It is my understanding,” or “claim of right.” The affidavit is for, and coming from, a completely different stance compared to a NUICOR or the Article 61, Magna Carta stuff.
Don’t anyone shoot me down here, this is strictly my opinion, but I am not convinced that the Magna Carta still stands as solidly as some think, in as much as it appears that King John signed this document under duress of the Barons; sword to the throat, and Pope Innocent III may have sent a papal bull and renounced this signing because of this. This research comes from here: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm I listened to a great interview by the Informer, but it has recently been removed by youtube. The world is driven by commerce and corporations, and it is the corporate world that is causing folk so many problems at the moment, so the affidavit forms a private agreement with the CEO of the UK PLC to assist in dealing with these problems.
2. The reason I suggest getting the whole process notarised is simply to add weight to the process as well as to your psychological confidence. One of the ways I deal with ‘public’ offers is to simply send the CEO or Chief Legal Officer a true, correct and complete copy of the whole notarised process, and thus far it has sent them running… there is something about a notary seal that they don’t like. Of course, it is important to remember that only a notary can give summary judgment (stare decisis, res judicata) administratively, a solicitor, barrister etc cannot.
3. Trying to get a notary to act as an “acceptor” in this country is not easy, I have not had any luck as of yet, but in truth why would you need it, because as long as you are swearing an oath to say that you didn’t get a response then that’s final. And in truth you could say that about the whole process up to the default.
Hope this helps Rob. Regards, Matt.
Hi Matt and thank you for all the excellent information you are imparting. I agree with you about the NOUICOR and feel that because of the ‘Commercial’ grip we are in then your Affadavit is a sound template to work from for others.
I have a question or two which you may or may not have answers too.
You mention the problem of securing the service of a ‘Notary Acceptor’ and I agree that if you swear Oath to not receiving replies than the Notary can witness your Oath. However, you said up to the point of ‘Default’, do you mean then that you will need a ‘Notary Acceptor’to go further and for the Affadavit to have substance? Or is the full process acceptable by simply having your Oath’s Notorised?
2. I don’t live in the UK at the moment I live in a EU country. I am english, I hold the provided ‘British Passport’ which I understand I can A4V but I do return to the UK Corporation several times a year. Having said that I think there is huge scope for educating others where I am to who they really are. My point is this, do you know if the same Affadavit once in Default can be used in other Company jurisdictions in ‘Europe’ to the same effect?
Thank you
Hi,
There is nothing stopping you getting ONLY the Notice of Default notarised under oath because if you look at the default it is stating the facts regarding the whole process anyway. But one of the great things about having the whole process notarised is that it stresses great weight when a corporate entity sees a notary seal on your paperwork, and if possible you want to deal with everything administratively.
If you really want to tie up the process then produce an Affidavit of truth (no respondent required) that states the whole process you undertook from the original affidavit to Notice of Default and get that notarised; that way you only have one document that you would have to send anywhere (obviously you only send true, correct and complete copies and not the original).
Remember that all law forms originate from England and a notary seal applies throughout the world, in fact that is one of the main reasons they are used. When you phone a notary they normally ask, “Is your document to be used in a foreign jurisdiction?” So I normally say that it might be at a later date. In truth the fact that you are coming from the private side means that it is foreign to the public anyway, but that won’t be a common piece of knowledge with most notaries as the are normally just solicitors that have received notary training. So an Affidavit is recognised throughout the world as is a default; remember commerce is uniform, which is why there is such a thing as the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code).
Regards, Matt.
Can you explain this please, sorry for my stupidity
“Non domestic without the United Kingdom”
Does the Affidavit Reference # have to be specific, is this given by the Notary?
Black’s Law 5th Ed. Domestic (adj) = Pertaining, belonging, or relating to a home, domicile, or to the place of birth, origin, creation, or transaction.
Now on the Affidavit it states;
For purposes of this affidavit and attached process, if any, the term “UNITED KINGDOM” means the corporation, and all agents, employees, subdivisions and representatives thereof, without any implied submission to the UNITED KINGDOM or such private corporate “statutes.”
So non domestic without the UK is simply stating that you do not belong, pertain or submit to the legal fiction corporation UNITED KINGDOM. Hope this helps. Regards, Matt.
The reference number can be anything you want it to be. It is simply there to be a unique number for your identification. For any of those folk out there that processed a UCC-1 Filing Statement and secured a load of particular numbers as collateral, I would use one of them, but for those that have no idea what that means just pick any number you want; it’s just for ID. Regards, Matt.
The “Seal” at the bottom is that where you will put your finger print? THANKS
I hope it works I want to create a notarised claim of right with a schedule of charges for arrest or detenion for alledged acts that dont fall within common law so if Im picked on by police for no good reason as we all are around here as they need funds then I want to have thempay me for my time which is priceless any ideas MATT.
Certainly is.
Hi Matt, very interesting stuff… I have been reading up on TPUC and they are trying to fight the system from within. Looks like your strategy is much more robust – just leave the damnable system altogether!
One question –
If I do all this, will I still be able to use my NI number and will I still have NHS coverage?
One more… (not trying to make this personal so ill refer in 3rd party terms)
Does the “free man” in question (like you) hold a normal job and pay taxes? Does the “free man” also use sterling or does he trade in original goods?
Basically is there some sort of normality we can hold onto – because If such a person leaves the system entirely then how can he work/ear/eat etc?
Hi,
Ok I am not trying to leave the system altogether as I am not in the position to move to another star system. The way I see it there are truly very few people that have managed to leave the system altogether, and in truth, it is not my intention. I am not at war with anyone, corporation or man, and don’t intend to be. Corporations have the potential to assist men and women in ways that would otherwise be impossible, so I have no wish to take the system down, I would rather work towards taking mankind up. We are all one, so we are the problem, which means there must be things about me that causes me and others problems, so my task is to ascertain what they are and change them as best I can. I see people expecting others to make the change they are not willing to make themselves; that, in my humble opinion, is very immature and unintelligent behaviour with zero wisdom attached.
You asked, “If I do this, will I still be able to use my NI number and will I still have NHS coverage?”
First things first: You do not have a NI number, it belongs to the state. Let them be liable for their property and you can still accept certain benefits that this particular “trust” account gives you if you so wish. So yes you can use the “trust” account (NI account) that appears to have been attributed to you, and so therefore, in reality, you will have exactly the same medical cover. I mean I cannot imagine someone like Gordon Brown sending copies to your dentist so your dentist can start to wake up to the massive corruption that we are all involved in; and yes we are ALL involved in this, and once we accept this then we can start to take responsibility for the self. Believe me; the bureaucrats are not going to want to advertise your lawful agreement with them
I am not a free man, yet I am on the continuing journey towards a higher level of freedom. I have not yet witnessed a freeman, although I am sure there must be some on this planet somewhere, but to consider myself a free man would not be accepting my whole reality at present. I go to work in exchange for pieces of paper (debt) to exchange for other services and goods in the commercial world. I do not attempt to “pay” income tax as in the UK it is impossible to “pay” anything, so why would I set myself such a target that cannot be met. A taxpayer is a legal fiction, a STRAWMAN, and those entities operate in bankruptcy, so they cannot “pay” either. And I have belief systems, attitudes and a paradigm that limits me, so consequently I am not a freeman.
So my friend, what is it you think you are doing with an affidavit? You are simply telling the truth as a man on your private documents and forming a lawful agreement. That’s it. An agreement that you can demonstrate at anytime that you see fit, and one that cannot be impaired. Affidavit’s will not cause you harm, as long as you make sure they contain your TRUTH. Read the points on the Affidavit many times over several days and look deep into their true meaning, and start to realise on a deep level who and what you are and what you are not. Regards, Matt.
Excellent post Matt, I had been toying in this area for some time now, but the language used was my barrier, your example makes creating additions all the easier to word now thank you.
I’m having difficulties with Notary Public in my area, so far they are refusing to confirm I am who I say I am. They have been instructed it seems to ask for more information than they are required under their codes and statutes, if the information is supplied they claim it is not a legal document and they refuse on those grounds, if I refuse to show them they claim they cannot book me time or give me a price as they do not know what I require.
I have explained it is only a confirmation that I am who I state I am on the affidavit and that is where their commitment ends, I have explained that the choice of paying a solicitor £15 or them £60 is my choice, I am aware of the cheaper alternative but prefer to have their seal.
I have threatened them with legal action for their breach of their public duties, which ends communications with them, but that is nothing lost when they have already refused.
No matter the approach, the notary still refuse to provide me with their services and as such I would like to know if anyone knows of any honourable notary that would seal an affidavit?
Alternatively, if anybody knows of a method to actually get yourself in an appointment with one which could apply the suitable pressure to make them perform their duty?
I live in North West England but would happily travel anywhere to use a honourable notary public.
regards
martin
Martin,
I am not sure what you mean that they won’t confirm who I say I am?
A notary only requires a passport and utility statement or bank statement. Now before you get excited and want to pull me up on the whole jurisdiction stuff, look at the Affidavit; by the use of public facilitites you are not submitting to jurisdiction! So take your passport and utility/bank statement and all will go well.
Phone them and inform the secretary that you have a document that requires verification from a Notary due to the possibility of this document being used in a foreign jurisdiction. If the secretary asks what the document is simply tell them that it is strictly confidential and private. If they really push tell them it’s a claim and you simply need your signature verifying. Remember your behaviour has to correspond to your private nature, so do not get into a long converstaion about your document, with the secretary or the Notary.
If you do not want to use a Notary on the initial documents, then just get two private witnesses on the initial document, the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and then just get the Notice of Default notarised under oath. Works very well; think it through and you will understand why. Also that way you haven’t got to mention anything about an affidavit to the Notary secretary, as all you want verified is a “Notice” that may possibly be used in a foreign jurisdiction. Regards, Matt.
For those who live near a County Court, try ringing them up and asking if they facilitate “Commercial Swearings” as some only charge about £12 for this service apparently, although I have never tried this myself. Regards, Matt.
Thanks Matt!!
So I’m starting to get a little clearer on the issue now.
Having the affidavit is like having a a stealthy weapon at the ready at all times to refute all the BS the government throw at us!
Hi Matt.
I have a few more questions and would greatly appreciate your advice on the matters.
In relation to “The Affiant is in peaceful and lawful possession of the property known as 007 BOND STREET, located on the geographical land mass commonly known as London, England.”
I do not own my own property and thus cannot lawfully claim rights to it as it belongs to my parents (or the bank). Should I just leave this point out?
Also “My commission expires: “ Is that for the use of Notary?
Also at the bottom of the affidavit you have inserted “John Smith, Affiant. Patricia Janet Scotland, Respondent. Affidavit, reference # ******. Page 3 of 3” Which is different to the other three page references which refer to Gordon Brown – is this a type error?
Also – If the Affidavit respondent is Gordon brown – then will the affidavit expire once he is no longer prime minister?
Also, If I move address does this invalidate the affidavit?
Also, Should I change the red text to black or leave it red once I have inserted my information?
Also, what is the reference number?
Many thanks for your time Matt,
Luke Bolger
Hi,
Luke, I would like you to think about your questions and then provide answers for your questions, and then I will give my opinion. Please own your answers and think about this from the private, creator, sentient man that you are. I feel it important to allow folk to look deeper as I can do more damage by just giving my answers, so I wish to empower you. Regards, Matt.
Here goes!
I think I will just leave the whole address out of it – as i do not own my own home…
Also “My commission expires: “ Is that for the use of Notary? Really not sure if this is for the Notary or me… If it was me i’d put “never!”
Also at the bottom of the affidavit you have inserted “John Smith, Affiant. Patricia Janet Scotland, Respondent. Affidavit, reference # ******. Page 3 of 3” Which is different to the other three page references which refer to Gordon Brown – is this a type error? I guess I will just leave this one out too as its not too important I dont think.
Also – If the Affidavit respondent is Gordon brown – then will the affidavit expire once he is no longer prime minister? Maybe I should add something more regional like “to the CEO of the united kingdom or the home office”
Also, If I move address does this invalidate the affidavit? I guess I can just re do the whole proccess at the new address.
Also, Should I change the red text to black or leave it red once I have inserted my information? Red is angry! I like red!
Also, what is the reference number? Does it matter? Ill put 002
Thanks Matt! You rock!
Hi Luke,
Thanks for giving your answers. I suggest that you gain a little more understanding concerning who and what you are before sending this affidavit, due to the answers you gave; they display an under-confidence my friend as well as anger, and anger especially serves little purpose within what is ultimately a spiritual battle here on the blue planet.
Here are the answers to your questions:
The “My commission expires” is for the notary.
Try downloading another affidavit this evening as there should be an amended one up with Patricia Janet Scotland removed.
The affidavit still stands when Gordon Brown leaves office; you still have an agreement (private law) with Gordon Brown, a former Prime Minister. Please read the documents again and the replies on here. You will notice that it is stressed on several occasions NOT to address private documents to something like the CEO of the UK.
Luke, the answer you gave here demonstrates your present lack of understanding. An affidavit creates a private agreement between the parties, how does where a man or woman live effect this?
Luke, another answer that concerns me; the red type simply demonstrates the areas where you change the details to fit your unique details; do NOT leave it red, and angry is far from positive my friend, especially over long periods.
The reference number is any number that you want to use, a unique number to you.
Luke, I encourage you to read the entire information regarding the affidavits again and again and absorb it; I believe that if you did this these questions wouldn’t arise. Regards, Matt.
Attention for Matt;
I have a notary who will help, I can be emailed for the details, He price is good to due to the volume. louis.scott@btinternet.com
Answers for luke…
Use the force luke 🙂
“My commission expires: “ is for the Notary. Everything after “acknowledgement” is for the notary
The “Patricia Janet” at the bottom is probably a typo. All footers should be the same except the page number.
The agreement shouldn’t expire when Gordon goes. But it is up to you whether you send another agreement to his sucessor in the UK / Europe.
Moving address is fine as long as you don’t move while doing the process.
The agreement is between the parties, not their addresses.
Change the red text to black when you have changed it to your details.
The reference number is so you can reference it from other documents. You could make the document reference number the same as the special delivery number 😉
Oops, apologies, didn’t realise it had been fielded already! :p
Thanks a million guys :))
Ill give it another read and try to shed some of the anger 🙂
You know, you people are all nuts. If you committed to purchase goods or services or borrow money, THEN YOU OWE IT BACK. Otherwise, you are a thief. Does this legal unenforceable nonsense make you feel morally clean?
Thanks for that Matt,
I think I may have a solution to most of the Notary problems, I was rejected by those in solicitor firms for any reason they could dream up and sounded plausible to them, creating an impassable problem.
Following your advice I contacted a new Notary found on the list of Notary Public found in TPUC forums, who was not listed with a solicitor firm. When I met him yesterday I spoke to him in length about the process I was doing and how I already knew I would be returning to him in 2 weeks to serve the notice of fault with option to cure.
The Notary I used was most helpful, he offered to seal each sheet, but alas there was no room for his seals, though future affidavits I will make room for him to seal each page.
He also commented on signing each page myself and not releasing the original document to the PM, gave me a receipt and told me I can get that back from Gordon (things I already knew, but nice to hear it from him), in fact to use a Notary who is not controlled by solicitor duties to protecting the offices known as courts was most enlightening.
Also the my comision expires is an American condition, Notary Public in UK are life time appointments, so that line is not necessary, but you do get the bonus of having wet blue ink writing that in handwriting belonging to the life notary which is better than any print in my opinion.
Again excellent post Matt, much appreciation for your efforts in this.
oh and the misunderstood part, I was only stating the duty of the Notary is ‘confirming my identity’ instead of saying ‘confirm who I say I am’.
regards
martin