<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lawful Rebellion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawfulrebellion.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org</link>
	<description>Stand for what is right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Freeman/Commercial Redemption: Time to give it to you straight by sui juris</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2010/01/06/freeman-commercial-redemption/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>sui juris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=656#comment-679</guid>
		<description>When are you coming back?!? You guys are needed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are you coming back?!? You guys are needed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Police, Mental Health Officers, Cybernetics and Us by dontmisallot</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2010/02/14/police-mental-health-officers-cybernetics-and-us/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>dontmisallot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=833#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Do you think that when women&#039;s lib was being fought for that it was envisioned that equality would be gained by both men and women being fully employed as debt slaves?

The lark that was the housing market has collapsed and while we take a breath we have a moment to reassess our priorities.  While mum and dad are both out working simply to try and pay the mortgage and utilities their precious children are in the hands of some underpaid nursery &#039;professional&#039;  No matter how good they are at their job, those who care for children for a living simply do not have the long term interests of that child at heart. We live with the consequences daily...too many (not all) ferral, uncared for youth...guided by computer games and trash tv.

We have institutionalised our children by the time they reach 3 yrs simply by virtue of nursery care.  One gets a drink...they all get a drink....at the same time, every single day.  One gets lunch..they all get lunch....whether hungry or not etc. etc.

It is only with a properly educated, free thinking, freely acting, creative population that we can ever progress.  The powers that be are not stupid.  The social quagmire is contrived, as is the breakdown of the family unit, attempts to eliminate national identity etc etc....and they are working.

Our political parties must ALL go.  They have been bought out a long time ago by corporate monsters of a psychopathic nature.  We should think about area representation with NO political party ties....and consensual politics.

Well done all here for at least talking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that when women&#8217;s lib was being fought for that it was envisioned that equality would be gained by both men and women being fully employed as debt slaves?</p>
<p>The lark that was the housing market has collapsed and while we take a breath we have a moment to reassess our priorities.  While mum and dad are both out working simply to try and pay the mortgage and utilities their precious children are in the hands of some underpaid nursery &#8216;professional&#8217;  No matter how good they are at their job, those who care for children for a living simply do not have the long term interests of that child at heart. We live with the consequences daily&#8230;too many (not all) ferral, uncared for youth&#8230;guided by computer games and trash tv.</p>
<p>We have institutionalised our children by the time they reach 3 yrs simply by virtue of nursery care.  One gets a drink&#8230;they all get a drink&#8230;.at the same time, every single day.  One gets lunch..they all get lunch&#8230;.whether hungry or not etc. etc.</p>
<p>It is only with a properly educated, free thinking, freely acting, creative population that we can ever progress.  The powers that be are not stupid.  The social quagmire is contrived, as is the breakdown of the family unit, attempts to eliminate national identity etc etc&#8230;.and they are working.</p>
<p>Our political parties must ALL go.  They have been bought out a long time ago by corporate monsters of a psychopathic nature.  We should think about area representation with NO political party ties&#8230;.and consensual politics.</p>
<p>Well done all here for at least talking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Basics and Potential Power of an Affidavit of Truth by edwards</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/30/the-basics-and-power-of-an-affidavit-of-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=300#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Hi,
   Matt this is the most fascinating stuff i&#039;ve come across since i first visited projectcamelot.org a couple of years ago.

I have a question for you, or anyone that can help with this quandary.

I am currently living at my girlfriends, so my council place is just there as extra space at the moment.

There&#039;s no gas supplied.Everything is electric, so i adjusted my tariff with my electric supplier so i don&#039;t pay a standing order, just whatever i use, which of course is nothing.

Do i really have to pay the standing order charges that i keep getting sent through by Yorkshire bleeding water, for not even being there?!

I have a place in a block of flats with 46 other tenants, and i noticed that without even using water, the standing order charges seem to take the pi**! If you multiply what i am charged, times the other 46 flats for surface water removal from the roof alone, it doesn&#039;t seem logical.

They could argue that without the standing order charge, i could still be using MY OWN water down the THEIR drains, but then surely that&#039;s a guilty till proven innocent scenario!

Please give me your thoughts.

 
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
   Matt this is the most fascinating stuff i&#8217;ve come across since i first visited projectcamelot.org a couple of years ago.</p>
<p>I have a question for you, or anyone that can help with this quandary.</p>
<p>I am currently living at my girlfriends, so my council place is just there as extra space at the moment.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no gas supplied.Everything is electric, so i adjusted my tariff with my electric supplier so i don&#8217;t pay a standing order, just whatever i use, which of course is nothing.</p>
<p>Do i really have to pay the standing order charges that i keep getting sent through by Yorkshire bleeding water, for not even being there?!</p>
<p>I have a place in a block of flats with 46 other tenants, and i noticed that without even using water, the standing order charges seem to take the pi**! If you multiply what i am charged, times the other 46 flats for surface water removal from the roof alone, it doesn&#8217;t seem logical.</p>
<p>They could argue that without the standing order charge, i could still be using MY OWN water down the THEIR drains, but then surely that&#8217;s a guilty till proven innocent scenario!</p>
<p>Please give me your thoughts.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toolbox: Stop taking the PCN by David Ophalus</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/18/toolbox-stop-taking-the-pcn/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ophalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=452#comment-673</guid>
		<description>jacob - it depends how determined you are with it all. but there is some truth in that when you send it back within 3 days it is difficult to process for them. you&#039;re right, once enough people do it then we should see more victories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jacob &#8211; it depends how determined you are with it all. but there is some truth in that when you send it back within 3 days it is difficult to process for them. you&#8217;re right, once enough people do it then we should see more victories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Harris &#8211; Lawful Rebellion &#8211; Live at BCG Conference 3 by FB</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/09/john-harris-lawful-rebellion-live-at-bcg-conference-3/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>FB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=161#comment-672</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRK9RXOZApg&amp;NR=1

US Lawful Rebellion ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRK9RXOZApg&amp;NR=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRK9RXOZApg&amp;NR=1</a></p>
<p>US Lawful Rebellion ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toolbox: Stop taking the PCN by Jacob</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/18/toolbox-stop-taking-the-pcn/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=452#comment-671</guid>
		<description>It seems after using the &quot;No Contract - Return to Sender&quot; process, you get a summons after about 4-5 months of returning the notices. If you use the same process with that, you get a letter from the DVLA saying you have been convicted and you must return your licence otherwise your driving privilages will be withdrawn. So what happens next if you use the same process? What can they do, if everyone does this? We cant all go to jail for sticking up for our rights and standing up to tyranny can they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems after using the &#8220;No Contract &#8211; Return to Sender&#8221; process, you get a summons after about 4-5 months of returning the notices. If you use the same process with that, you get a letter from the DVLA saying you have been convicted and you must return your licence otherwise your driving privilages will be withdrawn. So what happens next if you use the same process? What can they do, if everyone does this? We cant all go to jail for sticking up for our rights and standing up to tyranny can they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toolbox: Get &#8216;government&#8217; to lawfully agree that you&#8217;re not a person subject to Acts by Mark</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfully-agree-that-youre-not-a-person-subject-to-acts/comment-page-2/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=210#comment-670</guid>
		<description>There are mistakes in the Certified Copy document.

Are they going to get corrected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are mistakes in the Certified Copy document.</p>
<p>Are they going to get corrected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Police, Mental Health Officers, Cybernetics and Us by admin</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2010/02/14/police-mental-health-officers-cybernetics-and-us/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=833#comment-668</guid>
		<description>um, GCHQ by any chance? cheers for your input</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, GCHQ by any chance? cheers for your input</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toolbox: Stop taking the PCN by Reapstar</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/18/toolbox-stop-taking-the-pcn/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Reapstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=452#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Wow... lots of help here from the &quot;experts&quot;.

Why do I have to contract with entities of a fictitious nature whatsoever?

Why does ignoring something of no substance cause me undue grief?

IF I as a sovereign do not have to contract by choice, why do I still have to contract to save myself from the consequences of ignoring their fictions? 

What I suggested previously, i.e. conditional acceptance and charging &quot;admin fee&#039;s for processing their fictions seems like a suitable course of action given the circumstances?

How many times have you heard companies/corporations mention the need to charge admin fees for doing the job they are already being paid to do?

Surely there is someone educated enough on this forum to offer advice and guidance with regard to my truth which is, I accept your bs but I charge for the inconvenience of it all.

Anyone??

Or have I just not understood what I am supposed to be understanding?

Thank you in advance for your kind and prompt attention to this matter, I appreciate any and all help.

Howard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; lots of help here from the &#8220;experts&#8221;.</p>
<p>Why do I have to contract with entities of a fictitious nature whatsoever?</p>
<p>Why does ignoring something of no substance cause me undue grief?</p>
<p>IF I as a sovereign do not have to contract by choice, why do I still have to contract to save myself from the consequences of ignoring their fictions? </p>
<p>What I suggested previously, i.e. conditional acceptance and charging &#8220;admin fee&#8217;s for processing their fictions seems like a suitable course of action given the circumstances?</p>
<p>How many times have you heard companies/corporations mention the need to charge admin fees for doing the job they are already being paid to do?</p>
<p>Surely there is someone educated enough on this forum to offer advice and guidance with regard to my truth which is, I accept your bs but I charge for the inconvenience of it all.</p>
<p>Anyone??</p>
<p>Or have I just not understood what I am supposed to be understanding?</p>
<p>Thank you in advance for your kind and prompt attention to this matter, I appreciate any and all help.</p>
<p>Howard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Freeman/Commercial Redemption: Time to give it to you straight by jane taylor</title>
		<link>http://lawfulrebellion.org/2010/01/06/freeman-commercial-redemption/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>jane taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=656#comment-665</guid>
		<description>would like to know what processes redeem a mortgage - do we need to change our position in the trusts and do we use promissory notes ot bills of exchange</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would like to know what processes redeem a mortgage &#8211; do we need to change our position in the trusts and do we use promissory notes ot bills of exchange</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
